A new approach for evaluation of risk priorities of failure modes in FMEA

Franceschini, Fiorenzo; Galetto, Maurizio

doi:10.1080/00207540110056162

Cited by 158 publications

(106 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Existen una gran variedad de escalas que permiten evaluar el grado de consecuencia, ocurrencia y detección de cada elemento de la jerarquía [30,[36][37][38][39].…”

Section: Valores Recíprocosunclassified

Metodología para evaluar el nivel ético en las organizaciones

Soler

Delgado

García

2017

Ingeniare. Rev. chil. ing.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMENLa ética organizacional en la actualidad se erige como un referente en la gestión de las empresas que desean obtener resultados en un mundo cada vez más competitivo y globalizado, a pesar de que muchas organizaciones utilicen estos métodos de gestión para encubrir un objetivo superior, que no es otro que la maximización de los ingresos. La presente investigación propone por medio de los métodos: Análisis de Modos de Fallas, Efectos y Criticidad (AMFEC) y el Proceso de Jerarquía Analítica (AHP) y basada en los sistemas, normas e indicadores propuestos por diversas instituciones internacionales, una metodología para evaluar el nivel ético de una organización. La metodología posibilita la construcción de una jerarquía compuesta por dimensiones, factores críticos e indicadores aplicando el método AMFEC, el que permite evaluar cada uno de los elementos según su consecuencia, frecuencia de ocurrencia y detección. El método se complementa al determinar los pesos de los elementos mediante el AHP utilizando una escala fundamental de valores. La metodología propuesta determina el nivel ético en el impacto de sus dimensiones, así como evalúa mediante una escala el comportamiento ético de una organización, permitiendo valorar los efectos generados por las organizaciones en la sociedad, el medio ambiente y la economía.Palabras clave: Ética organizacional, análisis de criticidad, proceso de jerarquía analítica, nivel ético organizacional. ABSTRACT Nowadays Business ethics emerge as a referent in management into the organizations that want to obtain outcome in a competitive and globalized world, despite there are many companies that used these management methods for cover a top objective that is profit maximization. This research proposes through the methods: Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and systems, standards and indicators proposed by various international institutions a methodology for assessing the ethical level in an organization

show abstract

“…Existen una gran variedad de escalas que permiten evaluar el grado de consecuencia, ocurrencia y detección de cada elemento de la jerarquía [30,[36][37][38][39].…”

Section: Valores Recíprocosunclassified

Metodología para evaluar el nivel ético en las organizaciones

Soler

Delgado

García

2017

Ingeniare. Rev. chil. ing.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The new logic synthesis expression for Risk Priority Code (RPC) to change the order of priority among indexes is the basis for our work. The new logics of synthesis expresses changed composition of the operators and tie-ranking rule which is different from one that proposed by Franceschini & Galetto [7]. The new logic synthesis is appropriate to apply for finalizing mould designs in foundries.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hao Liu [12] proposed an extended fuzzy QFD from product planning to part deployment through a modified fuzzy k-means clustering method with fuzzy inference method for FMEA and α-cut operations to calculate the fuzzy sets in QFD. [7] and Sellapan & Karuppusami [8]. The new logic synthesis expression for Risk Priority Code (RPC) to change the order of priority among indexes is the basis for our work.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Failure Effects and Resolution of Modes: A Novel Fmea Treatise for Finalizing Mould Designs in Foundries

Selvan¹,

Jegadheesan²,

Varthanan³

et al. 2013

sajie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper proposes a novel strategy to finalize the mould design of a specific cast component through the failure analysis using case study data of a foundry. Traditional failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is one of the effective tools for prioritizing the possible failure modes by calculating the Risk priority Number (RPN) of a process/design. But in foundries, prioritizing the failures through the traditional FMEA produces unmatched results when RPN values are identical during preproduction trials. Hence it is very difficult to finalize moulds design of a specific cast component using traditional FMEA approach. This research paper addresses an alternate FMEA approach named FEAROM (Failure Effects And Resolution of Modes) to resolve the difficulty in finalizing the mould designs. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used for validating the results obtained using FEAROM method. The results presented are based on an experimental study carried out for a specific component in a foundry using the sand casting method. It is found that proposed FEAROM model matches well in practice and produces quality castings. OPSOMMINGHierdie artikel stel 'n nuwe strategie voor om die gietvormontwerp van 'n spesifieke gietstuk te finaliseer deur 'n gevallestudie van 'n falingsanalise van 'n smeltery. Tradisionele faal-en-effek-analise is een van die effektiewe hulpmiddels om die moontlike falings te prioritiseer deur die Risiko Prioriteitsnommer van 'n proses of ontwerp te bereken. In smelterye gee die prioritisering van faalings deur die Risiko Prioriteitsnommers onvergelykbare resultate wanneer die Risiko Prioriteitsnommers identies is tydens voorproduksieproewe. Gevolglik is dit baie moeilik om gietvormontwerpe van spesifieke gietstukke te finaliseer deur van die tradisionele faal-en-effek-analise benaderings gebruik te maak. Hierdie artikel stel 'n alternatiewe faal-en-effek-analise benadering voor, genaamd FEAROM ('Failure Effects And Resolution of Modes'), om die probleme met gietvormontwerpfinalisering aan te spreek. 'n Analitiese Hiërargieproses word gebruik om die resultate, met die FEAROM benadering bepaal, te valideer. Die resultate is gegrond op 'n gevallestudie van 'n spesifieke gietstuk in 'n smeltery wat gegiet is met die sandgietmetode. Daar word gevind dat die voorgestelde FEAROM model goed ooreenstem met die praktyk en hoë gehalte gietvorms as gevolg het.

show abstract

“…Unfortunately, such data are limited, ambiguous or even not exist due to the great uncertainty inherent in construction projects. Therefore, the quantitative approaches could not suitably and effectively handle the risks (Franceschini, Galleto 2001).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design and Pilot Run of Fuzzy Synthetic Model (Fsm) for Risk Evaluation in Civil Engineering

Abdul‐Rahman

Chen

Lee

2013

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Most of the current construction risk assessment tools deliver unsatisfactory results because the prerequisite for their effective applications rely on the availability of high quality data especially during the early stage of a project. Unfortunately, such data are limited, ambiguous or even not exist due to the great uncertainty inherent in construction projects. Based on Fuzzy Synthetic Analysis (FSA), a model development team was formed among construction engineers, IT professionals, and Mathematicians in developing a holistic risk assessment model to estimate the construction risks especially for the situations with incomplete data and vague environments. Through qualitative scales defined by triangular fuzzy numbers used in pairwise comparisons to capture the vagueness in the linguistic variables, a risk assessment model using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was developed. The Pilot Run revealed the developed Fuzzy Synthetic Model (FSM) could accelerate the decisionmaking process and provide optimal allocation of project resources to mitigate possible risks detrimental to the success of a project in terms of time, cost, and quality.

show abstract

A new approach for evaluation of risk priorities of failure modes in FMEA

Cited by 158 publications

References 14 publications

Metodología para evaluar el nivel ético en las organizaciones

Metodología para evaluar el nivel ético en las organizaciones

Failure Effects and Resolution of Modes: A Novel Fmea Treatise for Finalizing Mould Designs in Foundries

Design and Pilot Run of Fuzzy Synthetic Model (Fsm) for Risk Evaluation in Civil Engineering

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About