2015 38th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/mipro.2015.7160298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new color assessment methodology using cluster-based features for skin lesion analysis

Abstract: Melanoma is considered the most dangerous form of skin cancer, however if detected in early stages there are high success rates of recovery, making prevention essential. The risk assessment of skin lesions usually follows the ABCD rule (asymmetry, border, color and dermoscopic structures). This paper presents a methodology to assess the number of ABCD rule colors of skin lesion images. It starts by extracting 660 color features and several feature selection and machine learning classification methods are teste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further validate our model’s merit, we compared it with studies utilizing traditional machine learning algorithms. Vasconcelos et al [ 33 ]’s color evaluation method, which incorporated feature selection and machine learning classification, achieved identification accuracies of 0.7775 and 0.8138 on two smaller public datasets. Similarly, Ohki et al [ 34 ] employed the traditional RF classifier model, reaching a sensitivity and specificity of 0.7980 and 0.8070 on 1148 skin images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further validate our model’s merit, we compared it with studies utilizing traditional machine learning algorithms. Vasconcelos et al [ 33 ]’s color evaluation method, which incorporated feature selection and machine learning classification, achieved identification accuracies of 0.7775 and 0.8138 on two smaller public datasets. Similarly, Ohki et al [ 34 ] employed the traditional RF classifier model, reaching a sensitivity and specificity of 0.7980 and 0.8070 on 1148 skin images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we compared the result of AK-DL with other studies using traditional machine learning algorithms, and it also supported the superiority of the AK-DL model. Vasconcelos et al [31] proposed a new color evaluation method and then applied feature selection and machine learning classification, resulting in an identification accuracy of 0.7775 and 0.8138 on two smaller public datasets, respectively. Ohki et al [32] used the RF model, a traditional classifier, to automatically classify 1148 skin images (including 980 melanocytic nevi and 168 melanomas) and acquired sensitivity of 0.7980 and specificity of 0.8070 after taking a 10-fold cross-validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research proposed a method for color feature evaluation of lesion images using two datasets of dermoscopic images and one mobile-acquired dataset, which provided accuracy rates of 77.75%, 81.38%, and 93.55%, respectively. Although the methodology is successful, there are limitations, such as the reliance on machine learning and the need for broader and improved usability [12,13]. This work presented a persistent learning framework for training deep neural networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%