2013
DOI: 10.15388/na.18.2.14018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new family of fourth-order methods for multiple roots of nonlinear equations

Abstract: Recently, some optimal fourth-order iterative methods for multiple roots of nonlinear equations are presented when the multiplicity m of the root is known. Different from these optimal iterative methods known already, this paper presents a new family of iterative methods using the modified Newton’s method as its first step. The new family, requiring one evaluation of the function and two evaluations of its first derivative, is of optimal order. Numerical examples are given to suggest that the new family can be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Construction of higher‐order iterative methods for multiple roots having prior knowledge of multiplicity ( m >1) is one of the most important and challenging task in computational mathematics. No doubts, we have a small number of fourth‐order iterative methods for multiple roots, which were proposed by Neta and Johnson in (2008), Li et al in (2009), Neta, Sharma and Sharma, and Li et al in (2010), Zhou et al in (2011), Sharifi et al in (2012), Soleymani et al, Soleymani and Babajee, Liu and Zhou, and Zhou et al in (2013), Thukral in (2014), Behl et al and Hueso et al in (2015), Behl et al in (2016), and Zafar et al in (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Construction of higher‐order iterative methods for multiple roots having prior knowledge of multiplicity ( m >1) is one of the most important and challenging task in computational mathematics. No doubts, we have a small number of fourth‐order iterative methods for multiple roots, which were proposed by Neta and Johnson in (2008), Li et al in (2009), Neta, Sharma and Sharma, and Li et al in (2010), Zhou et al in (2011), Sharifi et al in (2012), Soleymani et al, Soleymani and Babajee, Liu and Zhou, and Zhou et al in (2013), Thukral in (2014), Behl et al and Hueso et al in (2015), Behl et al in (2016), and Zafar et al in (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construction of higher-order iterative methods for multiple roots having prior knowledge of multiplicity (m > 1) is one of the most important and challenging task in computational mathematics. No doubts, we have a small number of fourth-order iterative methods for multiple roots, which were proposed by Neta 8 Soleymani and Babajee, 9 Liu and Zhou, 10 and Zhou et al 11 in (2013), Thukral 12 in (2014), Behl et al 13 Out of them, iterative functions proposed by Li et al 5 (expect two of them are optimal), Neta and Johnson, 1 and Neta 3 are nonoptimal schemes of fourth order. On the other hand, rest of them are optimal according to classical Kung-Traub conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have been proposed in the literature; see, for example, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and the references therein. The techniques based on Newton's or the Newton-like method require the evaluations of derivatives of first order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few decades, many researchers have worked to develop iterative methods for finding multiple roots with greater efficiency and higher order of convergence. Among them, Li et al [3] in 2009, Sharma and Sharma [4] and Li et al [5] in 2010, Zhou et al [6] in 2011, Sharifi et al [7] in 2012, Soleymani et al [8], Soleymani and Babajee [9], Liu and Zhou [10] and Zhou et al [11] in 2013, Thukral [12] in 2014, Behl et al [13] and Hueso et al [14] in 2015, and Behl et al [15] in 2016 presented optimal fourth-order methods for multiple zeros. Additionally, Li et al [5] (among other optimal methods) and Neta [16] presented non-optimal fourth-order iterative methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%