2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new formula for assessing skeletal age in growing infants and children by measuring carpals and epiphyses of radio and ulna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most popular method by Greulich and Pyle (G&P) uses the atlas. 6 Another method is Tanner and Whitehouse method, which depends on a scoring technique and needs a trained observer. 21 More recently, digital methods (computer-aided-diagnosis methods) have been reported to estimate the skeletal age.…”
Section: Region/ Name Of the Bonementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The most popular method by Greulich and Pyle (G&P) uses the atlas. 6 Another method is Tanner and Whitehouse method, which depends on a scoring technique and needs a trained observer. 21 More recently, digital methods (computer-aided-diagnosis methods) have been reported to estimate the skeletal age.…”
Section: Region/ Name Of the Bonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] Example of these digital methods is the one developed by Cameriere et al 24 who described a formula based on the ratio between the area of carpal bones and the total area of carpal bones and distal epiphyses of radius and ulna. 6,[24][25][26] Estimation of skeletal age using MRI or ultrasonography of hand and wrist has been also reported. 27,19 The atlas by G&P contains standard normal radiographs of the left hand of children, and these are presented according to age and gender.…”
Section: Region/ Name Of the Bonementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [ 32 ], an ensemble technique has been proposed to extract a set of features from each finger’s joint which is later passed to a linear regressor to predict the final bone age. Instead of focusing on the finger’s features, the work in [ 33 ] has focused on utilizing features from carpals regions to estimate the bone age. On the other hand, methods in [ 34 , 35 ] have employed ANN regressor to determine the bone age.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%