A New Implant System with Directly Screwed Supraconstructions: Impact of Restoration Material and Artificial Aging on the Bending Moment

Südbeck, Sonja; Buser, Ramona; Reymus, Marcel; Hoffmann, Moritz; Edelhoff, Daniel; Stawarczyk, Bogna

doi:10.11607/ijp.8102

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Südbeck et al examined the impact of restoration material and artificial aging on the bending moment of implants with directly screwed restorations [93]. They found that implants without a titanium base showed higher initial bending moments, especially for 4Y-TZP restorations.…”

Section: Adhesion Features Of Translucent Zirconiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Translucent Zirconia in Fixed Prosthodontics—An Integrative Overview

Kui,

Manziuc,

Petruțiu

et al. 2023

Biomedicines

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the past two decades, dental ceramics have experienced rapid advances in science and technology, becoming the fastest-growing field of dental materials. This review emphasizes the significant impact of translucent zirconia in fixed prosthodontics, merging aesthetics with strength, and highlights its versatility from single crowns to complex bridgework facilitated by digital manufacturing advancements. The unique light-conducting properties of translucent zirconia offer a natural dental appearance, though with considerations regarding strength trade-offs compared to its traditional, opaque counterpart. The analysis extends to the mechanical attributes of the material, noting its commendable fracture resistance and durability, even under simulated physiological conditions. Various zirconia types (3Y-TZP, 4Y-TZP, 5Y-TZP) display a range of strengths influenced by factors like yttria content and manufacturing processes. The study also explores adhesive strategies, underlining the importance of surface treatments and modern adhesives in achieving long-lasting bonds. In the realm of implant-supported restorations, translucent zirconia stands out for its precision, reliability, and aesthetic adaptability, proving suitable for comprehensive dental restorations. Despite its established benefits, the review calls for ongoing research to further refine the material’s properties and adhesive protocols and to solidify its applicability through long-term clinical evaluations, ensuring its sustainable future in dental restorative applications.

show abstract

Section: Adhesion Features Of Translucent Zirconiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Translucent Zirconia in Fixed Prosthodontics—An Integrative Overview

Kui,

Manziuc,

Petruțiu

et al. 2023

Biomedicines

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Bending moment of implants restored with CAD/CAM polymer-based restoration materials with or without a titanium base before and after artificial aging

Südbeck

Hoffmann²,

Reymus³

et al. 2022

Dental Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One‐Piece Monolithic Zirconia Single Tooth Implant‐Supported Restorations in the Posterior Region: A 1‐Year Prospective Case Series Study

Donker,

Meijer,

Slot

et al. 2024

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo assess the clinical, radiographic and patient‐reported outcome measures, and the success of screw‐retained one‐piece monolithic zirconia implant‐supported restorations in the posterior region during a 1‐year follow‐up.MethodsIn a prospective case series, 50 single molar sites in the posterior region of 41 patients with a minimum age of 18 years and sufficient bone volume for placing an implant (≥ 8 mm) and space for an anatomical restoration were included. Following prosthetic‐driven digital three‐dimensional treatment planning, a tissue‐level implant with an internal connection was inserted during a one‐stage surgical procedure. Three months later, the implant was restored with a screw‐retained one‐piece monolithic zirconia restoration. Clinical, radiographic and patient‐reported outcome measures, and restoration survival and success according to the modified USPHS criteria were assessed at baseline prior to and immediately after implant placement, and 1‐month and 1‐year after definitive restoration placement.ResultsAt the 1‐year follow‐up, 1 implant had been lost (implant survival rate 98%) hence, 49 restorations were evaluated. The restoration survival and success rates were 100% and 98%, respectively. Plaque, calculus, bleeding and suppuration on probing and peri‐implant inflammation were absent in most cases. The mean (SD) marginal bone level change between implant placement and the 1‐year follow‐up was −0.14 mm (0.27) on the mesial and −0.25 mm (0.31) on the distal side. The mean (SD) patient satisfaction (0–10) was 9.2 (0.8) at the 1‐year evaluation.ConclusionOne‐piece monolithic zirconia implant‐supported restorations exhibited favourable outcomes over 1 year in situ.Trial Registration: Registered in the National Trial Register (NL9059)

show abstract

A New Implant System with Directly Screwed Supraconstructions: Impact of Restoration Material and Artificial Aging on the Bending Moment

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Translucent Zirconia in Fixed Prosthodontics—An Integrative Overview

Translucent Zirconia in Fixed Prosthodontics—An Integrative Overview

Bending moment of implants restored with CAD/CAM polymer-based restoration materials with or without a titanium base before and after artificial aging

One‐Piece Monolithic Zirconia Single Tooth Implant‐Supported Restorations in the Posterior Region: A 1‐Year Prospective Case Series Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About