1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02509894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new lexicon and framework for analyzing the internal structures of the U.S. Advanced Technology Program and its analogues around the world

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Crucial to the relevance of the present article is the fact that other countries do in fact subsidize private sector R&D, but such programs are not hard to find. “Technology Partnerships Canada,” the “Framework Program” in the European Union (EU), “Tekes” in Finland, “Teiankobo” in Japan, and the “Link Scheme” in the United Kingdom are just a few examples (Chang, 1998; Haaland and Kind, 2006). Neither is it hard to find examples where ATP funds projects for U.S. firms, the funding agency in another country funds the U.S. firm’s foreign competitor, and both firms are being funded for similar technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crucial to the relevance of the present article is the fact that other countries do in fact subsidize private sector R&D, but such programs are not hard to find. “Technology Partnerships Canada,” the “Framework Program” in the European Union (EU), “Tekes” in Finland, “Teiankobo” in Japan, and the “Link Scheme” in the United Kingdom are just a few examples (Chang, 1998; Haaland and Kind, 2006). Neither is it hard to find examples where ATP funds projects for U.S. firms, the funding agency in another country funds the U.S. firm’s foreign competitor, and both firms are being funded for similar technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Ρι φορείσ μποροφν να αξιολογθκοφν αυτοτελϊσ ι ωσ μζροσ μιασ κεντρικισ αξιολόγθςθσ του εκνικοφ ερευνθτικοφ ςυςτιματοσ (Balutis and Lambis, 2000;Chang, 1998;Okrasa, 1987;Perrin, 2002;Reid, 2001;Veugelers, 2009  Από μελζτεσ που ζχουν γίνει (Braun et al, 2009;Georghiou, 1998;Gutherie, 1990;Nagpaul and Gupta, 1989) γίνονται ςυχνά ςυςτάςεισ για καλφτερθ παρακολοφκθςθ, για ςυνεχι αξιολόγθςθ με ιδιαίτερθ ζμφαςθ ςτθ διαςφάλιςθ ποιότθτασ των μθχανιςμϊν και τθ χάραξθ ςτρατθγικισ χρθματοδότθςθσ από τουσ φορείσ, λαμβάνοντασ όμωσ υπόψθ τα αποτελζςματα τθσ αξιολόγθςθσ.…”
Section: αξιολόγθςθ γνωςτικϊν πεδίων για δθμόςια χρθματοδότθςθunclassified
“…Ρι τομείσ αυτοί είναι ο ςτόχοσ και το φψοσ τθσ χρθματοδότθςθσ του προγράμματοσ (Arnold and Guy, 1997; Arnold et al 2009;Anderson, 1989;Bjurulf, 2009;Chang, 1998;Corley, 2007;Donovan, 2008, Ergas, 1987McAllister et al, 1981;Nightingale, 2009;Nordregio, 2009;NRC, 1999;Okrasa, 1987;Papadakis and Link, 1997;Szakonyi, 1994;Tassey, 1995), τα επιςτθμονικά και τα τεχνολογικά αποτελζςματα (Barré, 1997;Barré, 1991;Butler, 2006;Courtial and Callon, 1991;Dean and Nishry, 1965;Debackere et al, 2002;Frame, 1983;Geisler, 2002;Haitun, 1986a;Haitun, 1986b;Haitun, 1983;Haitun and Pilipenko, 1983;Hauser, 1998 (Averch, 1991;Brooks, 1980;Brooks, 1982;Chabbal et al, 1988;Davis, 1990 Grupp et al, 1990;Helander, 1999;Horvat, 1999;JCSE, 1994;Lach, 2000;Mateev et al, 1983;McAlister, 1981;McLaughlin, 1995;…”
Section: αξιολόγθςθ και αξιολογθτζσ: ποιοι αξιολογοφν και πωσ αξιολογοφνται;unclassified