2017
DOI: 10.3103/s0027134916050131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method to obtain the Carnahan–Starling equation and its generalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of determining the pressure of the unsheared fluid thus reduces to the computation of the equation of state of a hard-sphere fluid, a widely studied subject, that still received a fair amount of attention in the last few years (see [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] and references therein). Indeed, if the Carnahan-Starling expression is often considered as the best compromise between simplicity and precision, it is not the most accurate in our regime of interest (ϕ 0.4).…”
Section: An Equation Of State For Inelastic Hard Spheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of determining the pressure of the unsheared fluid thus reduces to the computation of the equation of state of a hard-sphere fluid, a widely studied subject, that still received a fair amount of attention in the last few years (see [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] and references therein). Indeed, if the Carnahan-Starling expression is often considered as the best compromise between simplicity and precision, it is not the most accurate in our regime of interest (ϕ 0.4).…”
Section: An Equation Of State For Inelastic Hard Spheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found to our surprise (and to my horror) that the fundament transport law called the Starling equation in the physiology literature for more than a century (since 1896 (226)) did not have a mathematically satisfying derivation despite the best efforts of many (227)(228)(229)(230)(231)(232)(233).…”
Section: Fluid Flow Starling Equationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We found to our surprise (and to my horror) that the fundament transport law called the Starling equation in the physiology literature for more than a century (since 1896 226 ) did not have a mathematically satisfying derivation despite the best efforts of many. [227][228][229][230][231][232][233] The central issue, from our point of view, was the classical treatment of ionic solutions as simple liquids (nearly ideal gases, so well presented in previous work [30][31][32][33][34] ). It seemed clear to us that ionic solutions had too many too complex forms of energy (and flow and dissipation) to fit comfortably in a tradition that so thoroughly depended on the theory of ideal (i.e., perfect) gases (made of particles that did not interact at all, and had no internal structure) at equilibrium (with zero flows of all components) from which it grew.…”
Section: Fluid Flow Starling Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%