1997
DOI: 10.1080/014311697217053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new methodology for the estimation of biomass of coniferdominated boreal forest using NOAA AVHRR data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Various researchers developed different empirical models to estimate global forest biomass using satellite-derived NDVI and geographical location [30,32,94,95]. Among them, we followed the model used by [32] because this model used NDVI max to predict the biomass C density, which is also suitable for Nepal, rather than using growing season and annual average NDVI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various researchers developed different empirical models to estimate global forest biomass using satellite-derived NDVI and geographical location [30,32,94,95]. Among them, we followed the model used by [32] because this model used NDVI max to predict the biomass C density, which is also suitable for Nepal, rather than using growing season and annual average NDVI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para a estimativa de volume de madeira florestal em escala local e regional, são necessários dados provenientes de instrumentos sensores. Nesse sentido, podem ser utilizados dados do sensor TM da série de satélites Landsat como já demonstrado por diversos autores (FAZAKAS et al, 1999;HÄME et al, 1997;KRANKINA et al, 2004;TOMPPO et al, 2002;TURNER et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The difference in overall reflectance is attributed to variation in surface cover (Wang et al 2005). Hame et al (1997) stated that the difference in vegetation structure is attributed to variation in LAI. In general, AVHRR-LAI is generally described by higher values over the overlapping period as compared with MODIS-LAI.…”
Section: Spatial Discrepancy Between Original Avhrr-and Modis-derivedmentioning
confidence: 99%