2014
DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2014.907087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new paradigm for water? A comparative review of integrated, adaptive and ecosystem-based water management in the Anthropocene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to AM, two prominent approaches are integrated water resources management (IWRM) and ecosystembased approaches (EBAs). All three share similar goals concerning equity, human well-being, and sustainability, though with slight differences in emphasis: sustainability (IWRM), conservation (EBAs), and a combination of the first two through the lens of learning (AM) (Schoeman et al 2014). IWRM promotes sustainability through a governance framework that allows actors to negotiate integrated land and water management at the scale of the river basin, at which point it is called integrated river basin management (IRBM) (Grigg 2008).…”
Section: Diverse Approaches To Adaptive Water Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to AM, two prominent approaches are integrated water resources management (IWRM) and ecosystembased approaches (EBAs). All three share similar goals concerning equity, human well-being, and sustainability, though with slight differences in emphasis: sustainability (IWRM), conservation (EBAs), and a combination of the first two through the lens of learning (AM) (Schoeman et al 2014). IWRM promotes sustainability through a governance framework that allows actors to negotiate integrated land and water management at the scale of the river basin, at which point it is called integrated river basin management (IRBM) (Grigg 2008).…”
Section: Diverse Approaches To Adaptive Water Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three approaches increasingly converge in their application in water management as a result of debate among policy scientists ). Schoeman et al (2014) find that the strengths of all three can be combined to assist water managers in the following ways:…”
Section: Diverse Approaches To Adaptive Water Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the impacts of the Anthropocene on water are poorly understood, so the study of the hydrological effects of this new geological epoch should be a priority for researchers (Wheater 2015). At least, it should be noted that rec-ognition of the Anthropocene has rekindled the debate over the concept of water security, and motivated reflection on water paradigms (Schoeman, Allan and Finlayson 2014).…”
Section: Water and The Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Pahl-Wostl et al (2013: 709), there are 'major missing links between knowledge generation and policy framing' . This is a failure in academic research, because coping with the instability and uncertainty of the Anthropocene will require close co-operation among scientists, policy-makers and practitioners as well as among natural sciences, social sciences and humanities (Schoeman, Allan and Finlayson 2014;Pereira 2016); the aforementioned four key elements implied in the working definition of water security make this co-ordination mandatory. On this new planet, 'one role for scholarship […] is to provide those working more directly for social change with the knowledge and tools required for their efforts' (Nicholson and Jinnah 2016: 10).…”
Section: Water Security In the Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation