A New Requirement Prioritization Model for Market Driven Products Using Analytical Hierarchical Process

Iqbal, Muhammad Munwar; Zaidi, Athar Mohsin; Murtaza, Saeed

doi:10.1109/dsde.2010.49

Cited by 22 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous findings indicate that currently used prioritization methods have limited ability to support decision making in a complex area like requirements prioritization in market-driven product development [5]. Based on those findings Muhammad Atif Iqbal et al, proposes a new model called MDRPM (Market Driven Requirement Prioritization Model) which uses AHP (Analytical Hierarchical Process) [5]. In this model number of comparisons as compared to traditional AHP techniques are significantly reduced which make it practicable and applicable [5].…”

Section: Background/related Workmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Based on those findings Muhammad Atif Iqbal et al, proposes a new model called MDRPM (Market Driven Requirement Prioritization Model) which uses AHP (Analytical Hierarchical Process) [5]. In this model number of comparisons as compared to traditional AHP techniques are significantly reduced which make it practicable and applicable [5]. The limitation of this study is that, it assumes that there is no dependency between the candidate requirements and no conflict between the stakeholders during pair wise comparisons of the requirements [5].…”

Section: Background/related Workmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Hence, the method should be evaluated in the situation where the requirements are dependent [6]. Previous findings indicate that currently used prioritization methods have limited ability to support decision making in a complex area like requirements prioritization in market-driven product development [5]. Based on those findings Muhammad Atif Iqbal et al, proposes a new model called MDRPM (Market Driven Requirement Prioritization Model) which uses AHP (Analytical Hierarchical Process) [5].…”

Section: Background/related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover there are number of prioritization techniques that are available to prioritize requirements with their associated strength and limitations [3]. These includes: Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), B-Tree, Commutative Voting (100-dolar), Numeral assignment, Ranking, Top Ten Requirements, and Planning Game, spanning tree matrix, bubble sort [2][3][4][5]. According to Wohlin et al [4], AHP is the most promising method compared to the above mentioned techniques.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Analytical Hierarchy Process issues and mitigation strategy for large number of requirements

Nidhra

Satish

Ethiraj

2012

2012 CSI Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering (CONSEG)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Now-a-days most software projects have more candidate requirements. So it is vital for software companies to use different prioritization techniques to select valuable requirements among the candidate requirements. But software companies usually face a lot of challenges in using AHP such as increase in time and complexity with respect to number of comparisons. In this paper, we present previous work carried out in this research area and industrial study to identify the challenges software companies face while prioritizing large number of requirements using AHP. Different types of prioritization techniques have been developed to resolve these challenges. This paper focus on Numeral assignment technique which groups requirements into three categories: critical, standard and optional and AHP which prioritize requirements based on pair-wise comparisons. In this article we proposed a model i.e., NAcAHP where in which pair-wise comparison of AHP is applied on critical group of Numeral assignment technique for prioritizing the requirements. The result shows that the proposed model minimizes the time and complexity of pair wise comparison.

show abstract

Section: Background/related Workmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Background/related Workmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Background/related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Analytical Hierarchy Process issues and mitigation strategy for large number of requirements

Nidhra

Satish

Ethiraj

2012

2012 CSI Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering (CONSEG)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From a technical viewpoint, AHP is one of the most comprehensive systems designed for decision-making with multiple measures since it allows the formulation of the problem in a hierarchical manner and enables one to consider various quantitative and qualitative measures [23]. Besides this, other methods for requirements prioritization have been introduced, some of which are mentioned below [20,22] In addition to these methods, other prioritization techniques exist among which are B-Tree based methods, Quality-based methods, genetic Algorithm or Value-based methods [24,25]. These methods try to increase the requirements prioritization quality by decreasing the number of comparisons, considering certain specifications for prioritization and lessening the complexity.…”

Section: Effective Parameters In Requirements Prioritizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a highly customizable framework for release planning process

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Original scientific paper In software development, release planning is performed to select important features and requirements based on resource and technical constraints and the relationships between requirements. Release planning focuses on finding an optimal solution by seeking various states. This kind of solution finding reveals two remarks. First, it shows that there are various, ambiguous and uncertain parameters that influence the solution. Second, there is not only one solution to any problem. Various solutions can be found that differ in their performance (e.g. time performance, complexity performance, etc.). Consequently, many methods for release planning are often specific to only certain problem domains. This paper examines various current release planning methods to extract the common activities and thoughts in order to establish a customizable framework for release planning. Customization is done by identifying effective parameters, parameter instances and their relationships so that they can affect the selection of the right algorithm or method for each activity. Project characteristics can be specified based on the parameter instances and they are then used to determine the suitable method for achieving each activity within the whole release planning process and the results of which are recorded. This proposed highly customizable process framework with its possible customization features is then validated in several software companies. In 85 % of the cases, the suggested framework for every activity of the process fits the companies' circumstances and helps to hasten the process of release planning.Keywords: customizable process; effective parameters; release planning U cilju velike prilagodljivosti okvira za planiranje puštanja u promet Izvorni znanstveni članak U razvoju softvera, planiranjem puštanja u promet izabiru se važna svojstva i zahtjevi temeljeni na tehničkim ograničenjima i ograničenjima sredstava te odnosima između zahtjeva. Planiranje puštanja u promet usmjereno je na pronalaženje optimalnog rješenja traženjem raznih stanja. Takav način traženja rješenja otkriva dvije stvari. Prvo, pokazuje da postoje različiti nejasni i nesigurni parametri koji utječu na rješenje. Drugo, da ne postoji samo jedno rješenja za neki problem. Mogu postojati različita rješenja koja se razlikuju po svojim karakteristikama (na pr. u odnosu na trajanje, složenost itd.). Stoga su mnoge metode planiranja puštanja u promet često specifične za samo neke aspekte problema. U ovom se radu istražuju razne postojeće metode za planiranje pokretanja u svrhu pronalaženja nekih općih razmišljanja i aktivnosti za uspostavljanje prilagodljivog okvira za planiranje puštanja u promet. Prilagodba se postiže identificiranjem učinkovitih parametara ili primjera parametara i njihovih odnosa tako da se može izabrati pravi algoritam ili metoda za svaku aktivnost. Karakteristike projekta mogu se odrediti na osnovu primjera parametara te se oni tada primjenjuju za određivanje odgovarajuće metode za izvršavanje pojedine aktivnosti...

show abstract

Prioritizing Use Cases for Development of Mobile Apps Using AHP: A Case Study in To-Do List Apps

Yıldırım

Peker

2019

Mobile Web and Intelligent Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A New Requirement Prioritization Model for Market Driven Products Using Analytical Hierarchical Process

Cited by 22 publications

References 12 publications

Analytical Hierarchy Process issues and mitigation strategy for large number of requirements

Analytical Hierarchy Process issues and mitigation strategy for large number of requirements

Towards a highly customizable framework for release planning process

Prioritizing Use Cases for Development of Mobile Apps Using AHP: A Case Study in To-Do List Apps

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About