2012
DOI: 10.2112/jcoastres-d-11-00107.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New, Robust, and Accurate Method to Extract Tide-Coordinated Shorelines from Coastal Elevation Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy analysis showed that the standard deviation of the depth measurement error was 0.11-0.19 m for depths ranging from 0.1 to 5.57 m. The criteria for the selection of this method included the depth measurement accuracy, hydrometeorological conditions occurring during the performance of photogrammetric surveys and the measurement equipment used from among all the analysed methods [12,[57][58][59][60][61]. The third criterion is the coastline extraction component proposed by Xu et al [87] An accuracy analysis showed that the standard deviation of the error in determining the shoreline position was 1 m. The criteria for the selection of this method included the automation of the extraction process and the accuracy of determining the coastline position from among all the analysed methods [80][81][82][83][84][85][86].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The accuracy analysis showed that the standard deviation of the depth measurement error was 0.11-0.19 m for depths ranging from 0.1 to 5.57 m. The criteria for the selection of this method included the depth measurement accuracy, hydrometeorological conditions occurring during the performance of photogrammetric surveys and the measurement equipment used from among all the analysed methods [12,[57][58][59][60][61]. The third criterion is the coastline extraction component proposed by Xu et al [87] An accuracy analysis showed that the standard deviation of the error in determining the shoreline position was 1 m. The criteria for the selection of this method included the automation of the extraction process and the accuracy of determining the coastline position from among all the analysed methods [80][81][82][83][84][85][86].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fernández Luque I. et al, 2012 [81] Visual and quantitative assessment of the proposed method on a single dataset. The use of the contour method [80,88] as the reference method.…”
Section: Author and The Year Of Publication The Manner Of Methods Val...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This contour line is the coastline. Reference [7] uses data for step-by-step operations to extract coastline and optimizes the edges of the coastline; Reference [8] uses a coastal elevation model to extract the coastline during tides; Reference [9] conducted research on the extraction of shorelines from shallow and muddy areas, while reference [10] used Monte Carlo simulation to extract shorelines and evaluate their accuracy. References [11,12] attempt to separate land and water using lidar data, but when there is vegetation cover, the boundary between land and water in the vegetation covered area cannot represent the coastline, which is far from the actual coastline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%