A new visual evoked potential system for vision screening in infants and young children

Simon, John W.; Siegfried, John B.; Mills, Monte D.; Calhoun, Joseph H.; Gurland, Judith E.

doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.08.009

Cited by 30 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Instrument-based devices using technology based on visual evoked potentials 23 and retinal birefringence 24 are currently in development and may provide additional means to assess visual acuity and ocular health in young children.…”

Section: Instrument-based Screening Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Procedures for the Evaluation of the Visual System by Pediatricians

Donahue¹,

Baker²

2016

Pediatrics

117

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Instrument-based Screening Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Procedures for the Evaluation of the Visual System by Pediatricians

Donahue¹,

Baker²

2016

Pediatrics

117

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The DIOPSYS system has been approved by the FDA for use in clinic patients. It has been used in many medical and optometric practices [48] and, for the past 3 years, it has been used extensively in our laboratory [2,[49][50][51].…”

Section: Apparatusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimization of the pattern visual evoked potential (VEP) in the visually-normal and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) populations

Yadav¹,

Ciuffreda²

2013

Brain Injury

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This system is available commercially and has been approved by the FDA. It is used in several pediatric clinics, as well as adult medical and optometric practices [8,19]. The stimulus was presented on the 17 00 LCD display monitor with a refresh rate of 75 Hz.…”

Section: Apparatusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of different stimulus configurations on the visual evoked potential (VEP)

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to assess changes in the response profile of the pattern visual evoked potential (VEP) using three stimulus configurations simulating visual-field scotomas: central circular and central blank fields increasing incrementally in diameter from 1° to 15°, hemi-field, and quadrant patterns. Five visually normal adult subjects (ages 22-68 years) were tested binocularly at 1 m for each stimulus configuration on 5 separate days. A checkerboard test pattern (64 × 64 black-and-white checks, 85% contrast, 64 cd/m(2) luminance, 20 s of stimulus duration, 2-Hz temporal frequency) was used. The group mean VEP amplitude increased in a linear manner with increase in the central circular diameter (y = 0.805x + 2.00; r = 0.986) and decrease in central blank field diameter (y = -0.769x + 16.22; r = 0.987). There was no significant change in latency in nearly all cases. The group mean coefficient of variability results indicated that the VEP amplitude was repeatable for the different stimulus configurations. The finding of VEP response linearity for the circular stimulus fields, and repeatability for all stimulus configurations, suggests that the clinician may be able to use the VEP technique with the suggested test patterns as a rapid and simple tool for objective assessment for several types of visual-field defects for a range of abnormal visual conditions and special populations.

show abstract

A new visual evoked potential system for vision screening in infants and young children

Cited by 30 publications

References 27 publications

Procedures for the Evaluation of the Visual System by Pediatricians

Procedures for the Evaluation of the Visual System by Pediatricians

Optimization of the pattern visual evoked potential (VEP) in the visually-normal and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) populations

Effect of different stimulus configurations on the visual evoked potential (VEP)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About