2015
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2015/13123.6286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Noble, Easy and Conceptual Radiographic Analysis to Assess the Type of Tooth Movement (Molar Distalization)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The orbital floor was therefore used as a stable reference point. It has also been used, via a line constructed between right and left orbitale to monitor orthodontic distalisation of molar teeth (Bansal et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orbital floor was therefore used as a stable reference point. It has also been used, via a line constructed between right and left orbitale to monitor orthodontic distalisation of molar teeth (Bansal et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvement in the axial inclination of upper anterior teeth suggests adequate torque expression by the sequential archwires. Molar distalization changes were calculated by using Radiographic Analysis (Figure 6), as recommended by Abhishek et al 12 About 3 mm of maxillary molar distalization (U6 to PTV and U6 to Facial axis) was achieved post four months of distalization force application and was clinically observed by a change in full cusp class II into end-on molar relation. The change in axial inclination was minimal as indicated by the amount of tipping (α angle) and U6 to TVL (cusp tip and root apex), as summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Treatment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A line, termed the ‘O’ line, was made between the right and left orbitales on both the OPGs. The ‘O’ line was considered the stable line 8 . The cemento-enamel junction of the distal border of the right and left premolars was marked in both OPGs as CPr1, CPl1, CPr2, and CPl2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%