2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00226-002-0161-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-destructive approach for assessing decay in preservative treated wood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil-block trials commonly result in more variable wood decay and higher threshold values than agar-block trials when testing wood preservatives (Cockroft 1974;Wazny and Cookson 1994;Jamsa and Viitaniemi 1998), particularly those targeting oxidative decay mechanisms (Backa et al 1992;Green and Schultz 2003), and soil type has been shown to affect preservative efficacy (Machek et al 2004). We were not able to fully explain the cause of oxalate decreases in wood during decay, primarily due to variability in our soil-block decay data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil-block trials commonly result in more variable wood decay and higher threshold values than agar-block trials when testing wood preservatives (Cockroft 1974;Wazny and Cookson 1994;Jamsa and Viitaniemi 1998), particularly those targeting oxidative decay mechanisms (Backa et al 1992;Green and Schultz 2003), and soil type has been shown to affect preservative efficacy (Machek et al 2004). We were not able to fully explain the cause of oxalate decreases in wood during decay, primarily due to variability in our soil-block decay data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemmens N.V.; Leuven; Belgium). More information about this procedure can be consulted in Hearmon (1966) and Machek et al (2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A umidade foi ajustada para 80% da capacidade de retenção de água (IPT, 1980). Os corpos de prova foram dispostos verticalmente no solo, com aproximadamente 2 cm de comprimento acima da superfície do solo (MACHEK et al, 2004). Dos 10 corpos de prova utilizados em cada variável, 6 foram soterrados em solo não estéril e 4 em solo estéril, de acordo com método proposto pelo IPT (1980).…”
Section: Ensaio Acelerado De Laboratóriounclassified