2003
DOI: 10.1023/b:ebfi.0000005732.98047.f3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Noninvasive Technique for Determining Sex of Live Adult North American Sturgeons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Total length (nearest cm) and wet weight were recorded for each individual (Table 1). Sex was not included as an explanatory variable in any analyses because sex could not be determined for 75 % of acoustic-tagged individuals (North American sturgeon are difficult to sex unless captured in spawning-ready condition [18]). All acoustic-tagged lake sturgeon were captured and released upstream of the Chenal a bot Rond confluence and downstream of Pt.…”
Section: Lake Sturgeon Capture and Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total length (nearest cm) and wet weight were recorded for each individual (Table 1). Sex was not included as an explanatory variable in any analyses because sex could not be determined for 75 % of acoustic-tagged individuals (North American sturgeon are difficult to sex unless captured in spawning-ready condition [18]). All acoustic-tagged lake sturgeon were captured and released upstream of the Chenal a bot Rond confluence and downstream of Pt.…”
Section: Lake Sturgeon Capture and Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method was developed to determine the sex of some sturgeon species (A. oxyrinchus, A. brevirostrum, and A. medirostris) by examination of the shape of the external urogenital, the accuracy of which is as high as 82%, but this method is not suitable for other sturgeon species (59). Because there is no external sexual dimorphism in the some sturgeon, for example, the Russian sturgeon, the development of internal gonads is the only biomarker for sex identification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual dimorphism between females and males is very clear for some fish species with differences in body shape, coloration, caudal fin shape, number of genital openings, etc. However, most flatfish do not show any morphological difference between sexes and either cannulation or ovarian biopsy is needed (Vecsei et al, 2003). In this study with P. adspersus the identification of females and males was carried out by cannulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%