2006
DOI: 10.5414/cnp65141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nosocomial parvovirus B19 infection-induced transient aplastic crisis in a patient with chronic renal failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this remains controversial. Nosocomial spread of infection in an enclosed dialysis unit is also a potential threat, but this is not well described in the literature (74).…”
Section: Parvovirus Infection In Dialysis Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this remains controversial. Nosocomial spread of infection in an enclosed dialysis unit is also a potential threat, but this is not well described in the literature (74).…”
Section: Parvovirus Infection In Dialysis Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symptoms are typically present during viremia, and then resolve when neutralizing antibodies are produced [5,7,21]. Most immunocompetent adults will only have mild symptoms related to reticulocytopenia and/or transient anemia related to the red blood cell lifespan and reserve [15]. Red cell aplasia, however, is seen in patients with hemolytic syndromes due to rapid red cell turnover, as well as immunocompromised hosts due to poor immune response to infection [5].…”
Section: Clinical Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parvovirus B19 is transmitted through respiratory secretions due to viral shedding in viremic patients. Nosocomial infections have been reported [15]. Patients with active parvovirus infection should be isolated in the hospital.…”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Without sequence data from other circulating strains unrelated to this potential transmission event, the sequence data from D1 and R1 can potentially be interpreted as either that D1 and R1 are independently infected by two highly similar strains not differentiable by the partial sequences presented, or a single highly prevalent circulating strain. Nosocomial infections from infected staff or patient have been reported previously in the literature [2,3], and Juhl et al did not present data to exclude potential concurrent B19V infection within the ward in which R1 was a patient.In D2/R2, R2 did not show seroconversion after the alleged transfusion transmitted infection. The investigators proposed two possible reasons: antibody adsorption and permanent protein loss.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%