2013
DOI: 10.11609/jott.o3356.4392-403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on five freshwater sponges (Porifera: Spongillina: Spongillidae) from Pune, Maharashtra, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2D): natural, large lotic water-bodies. [*reported earlier (Jakhalekar & Ghate 2013;Kulkarni et al 2015) The majority of the sponge collections were made between 2011 and 2015 from the shallow peripheral areas of the water-bodies. Dry seasons (summers) were mostly preferred for collections, as it was easier to collect the sponges from deeper zones of the water-beds by wading and the presence of mature gemmules in good number was also ensured.…”
Section: Freshwater Sponges From Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2D): natural, large lotic water-bodies. [*reported earlier (Jakhalekar & Ghate 2013;Kulkarni et al 2015) The majority of the sponge collections were made between 2011 and 2015 from the shallow peripheral areas of the water-bodies. Dry seasons (summers) were mostly preferred for collections, as it was easier to collect the sponges from deeper zones of the water-beds by wading and the presence of mature gemmules in good number was also ensured.…”
Section: Freshwater Sponges From Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But both these works do not incorporate either SEM observations on spicules / gemmules or habitus images. Studies on freshwater sponges of India after Annandale are sparse and have been summarised previously (Jakhalekar & Ghate 2013). According to Soota (1991), the Indian region possesses 30 species of freshwater sponges in 10 genera of the family Spongillidae Gray.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sponges were identified according to the morphology of their skeletal structures including megascleres, microscleres, gemmoscleres and the architecture of the gemmules, as seen under a SEM (Penney & Racek 1968;Jakhalekar & Ghate 2013) (Images 2 & 3). For identification, pieces of freshly collected live sponges were dissolved in concentrated nitric acid and washed with distilled water for isolation of the siliceous spicules (Annandale 1911;Soota 1991).…”
Section: Taxonomical Identification Of Sponge Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ultra structural analyses with SEM, isolated spicules were thoroughly washed with distilled water and air dried. Longitudinal sections of the gemmules were made using a sharp stainless steel blade (Jakhalekar & Ghate 2013). Gemmules, both intact and sectioned, were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde (Sigma, USA) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.8) for 2 hours at 4 0 C (Willenz & Van de Vyver 1982;Mukherjee et al 2015c), washed with cacodylate buffer 3 times and fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (Sigma, USA) for 1 hour.…”
Section: Taxonomical Identification Of Sponge Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%