2013
DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2011.607875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Free Idempotent Generated Semigroups over the Full Monoid of Partial Transformations

Abstract: Recently, Gray and Ruškuc proved that if e is a rank k idempotent transformation of the set {1, . . . , n} to itself and k n − 2, then the maximal subgroup of the free idempotent generated semigroup over the full transformation monoid T n containing e is isomorphic to the symmetric group S k . We prove that the same holds when T n is replaced by PT n , the full monoid of partial transformations on {1, . . . , n}.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that our result is independent of the exact nature of the group concerned, which is still unknown in general. As a corollary, we obtain the main result of Dolinka [7].…”
Section: Ig3) the Restriction Of φ To The Maximal Subgroup H E Of Ig(supporting
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note that our result is independent of the exact nature of the group concerned, which is still unknown in general. As a corollary, we obtain the main result of Dolinka [7].…”
Section: Ig3) the Restriction Of φ To The Maximal Subgroup H E Of Ig(supporting
confidence: 48%
“…(2) follows from Theorem 4.8 and [5]. (3) has already been observed in [7] and is a special case of (2).…”
Section: Proof (I) Follows Immediately From Lemma 43 (I)mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We then check that the corresponding identities to determine G ≀ S r are satisfied by these generators, and it is then a short step to obtain our goal, namely, that H ∼ = H (Theorem 9.13). We note, however, that even at this stage more care is required than, for example, in the corresponding situation for T n [14] or PT n [3], since we cannot assume that G is finite. Indeed our particular choice of Schreier system will be seen to be a useful tool.…”
Section: Theorem 33 [13]mentioning
confidence: 99%