2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the lack of symmetry in the graphical lasso

Abstract: The graphical lasso (glasso) is a widely-used fast algorithm for estimating sparse inverse covariance matrices. The glasso solves an ℓ 1 penalized maximum likelihood problem and is available as an R library on CRAN. The output from the glasso, a regularized covariance matrix estimateΣ glasso and a sparse inverse covariance matrix estimateΩ glasso , not only identify a graphical model but can also serve as intermediate inputs into multivariate procedures such as PCA, LDA, MANOVA, and others. The glasso indeed p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We define the error matrix normalΔ$$ \Delta $$ as truenormalΘ^prefix−normalΘ$$ \hat{\Theta}-\Theta $$, and refer to its i,jth$$ i,{j}^{th} $$ element as δij$$ {\delta}_{ij} $$. Although the true precision matrix is symmetric, the estimated matrix may not be; a notable example of possible asymmetry is in the graphical lasso algorithm 34 . Therefore, we considered every element of the error matrix normalΔ$$ \Delta $$ rather than just upper or lower triangular components.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We define the error matrix normalΔ$$ \Delta $$ as truenormalΘ^prefix−normalΘ$$ \hat{\Theta}-\Theta $$, and refer to its i,jth$$ i,{j}^{th} $$ element as δij$$ {\delta}_{ij} $$. Although the true precision matrix is symmetric, the estimated matrix may not be; a notable example of possible asymmetry is in the graphical lasso algorithm 34 . Therefore, we considered every element of the error matrix normalΔ$$ \Delta $$ rather than just upper or lower triangular components.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the true precision matrix is symmetric, the estimated matrix may not be; a notable example of possible asymmetry is in the graphical lasso algorithm. 34 Therefore, we considered every element of the error matrix Δ rather than just upper or lower triangular components.…”
Section: Design Of Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, although the true precision matrix is symmetric, the estimated matrix may not be: a notable example of possible asymmetry is in the graphical lasso algorithm (44). Therefore, we consider every element of the error matrix ∆ rather than just upper or lower triangular components when assessing estimation performance.…”
Section: Assessing Estimation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the penalty ( 4 ) is slightly different from original definition 30 , expressed as When we do not assume that , the estimate of the inverse covariance matrix with ( 5 ) is not symmetric. Since the original graphical lasso algorithm does not assume that 31 , 34 , we slightly modify the penalty as in Eq. ( 4 ).…”
Section: Simulation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%