2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.113936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel electrochemical platform based on indenoindole for selective detection of Cu2+ ions in Punica granatum fruit juice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 C NMR (125 MHz, CD 3 OD): δ 168.3 (C-α’), 149.7 (C-4’’’), 148.0 (C-γ’), 146.8 (C-4), 146.1 (C-3’’’), 144.7 (C-3), 131.5 (C-1), 127.7 (C-1’’’), 123.2 (C-6’’’), 121.2 (C-6), 117.1 (C-2), 116.5 (C-5’’’), 116.3 (C-5), 115.2 (C-2’’’), 114.7 (C-β’), 104.2 (C-1’), 103.0 (C-1’’), 81.6 (C-3’), 76.2 (C-2’), 76.0 (C-5’), 73.8 (C-4’’), 72.3 (C-2’’), 72.2 (C-α), 72.0 (C-3’’), 70.6 (C-4’), 70.4 (C-5’’), 62.4 (C-6’), 36.5 (C-β), 18.4 (C-6’’).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 C NMR (125 MHz, CD 3 OD): δ 168.3 (C-α’), 149.7 (C-4’’’), 148.0 (C-γ’), 146.8 (C-4), 146.1 (C-3’’’), 144.7 (C-3), 131.5 (C-1), 127.7 (C-1’’’), 123.2 (C-6’’’), 121.2 (C-6), 117.1 (C-2), 116.5 (C-5’’’), 116.3 (C-5), 115.2 (C-2’’’), 114.7 (C-β’), 104.2 (C-1’), 103.0 (C-1’’), 81.6 (C-3’), 76.2 (C-2’), 76.0 (C-5’), 73.8 (C-4’’), 72.3 (C-2’’), 72.2 (C-α), 72.0 (C-3’’), 70.6 (C-4’), 70.4 (C-5’’), 62.4 (C-6’), 36.5 (C-β), 18.4 (C-6’’).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be stressed that levels of Cu 2+ concentrations in drinking water below 2 mg L −1 correspond to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. 11 15 In fact, Cu 2+ ions can be detected and quantified by routine methods with the most common being flame atomic absorption spectrometry with a limit of detection (LoD) at level less than 10 nM. 16 18 Other methods include the most sensitive, that is, mass spectrometry (coupled to inductively coupled plasma) with an LoD of 5 ng L −1,19,20 as well as optical 21 –24 and electrochemical 14,15,25 techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various instrumental analytical techniques have been used to detect Cu 2+ , such as inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, 9 thin-layer chromatography, 10 electrochemical methods, 11 colorimetry, 12 atomic absorption spectroscopy, and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. 13 Although these traditional methods have shown significant promise for the detection of copper ions, they typically require expensive instrumentation, complex sample pretreatment steps, organic solvents, and highly skilled personnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%