2022
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12975-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Fat-Augmented Omentum-Based Construct for Unilateral and Bilateral Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction in Underweight and Normal Weight Women Receiving Nipple or Skin-Sparing Mastectomies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current methods for autologous reconstruction involving free or pedicled myocutaneous tissue flaps have provided favorable outcomes for patients undergoing non-implant-based breast reconstruction. However, the requirements for free or pedicled flaps such as the latissimus dorsi, TRAM, DIEP, or SIEA flaps may make the option not appropriate or attainable for patients with a lower BMI or inadequate adipose tissue volume [ 13 , 31 ]. Additionally, patients opting for bilateral breast reconstruction that requires more tissue volume to appropriately reconstruct a breast mound ideal for their body frame may have to forgo the benefits of autologous reconstruction and may only have the option for implant-based reconstruction.…”
Section: Current Practices and Methods Of Omental-based Breast Recons...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Current methods for autologous reconstruction involving free or pedicled myocutaneous tissue flaps have provided favorable outcomes for patients undergoing non-implant-based breast reconstruction. However, the requirements for free or pedicled flaps such as the latissimus dorsi, TRAM, DIEP, or SIEA flaps may make the option not appropriate or attainable for patients with a lower BMI or inadequate adipose tissue volume [ 13 , 31 ]. Additionally, patients opting for bilateral breast reconstruction that requires more tissue volume to appropriately reconstruct a breast mound ideal for their body frame may have to forgo the benefits of autologous reconstruction and may only have the option for implant-based reconstruction.…”
Section: Current Practices and Methods Of Omental-based Breast Recons...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, patients opting for bilateral breast reconstruction that requires more tissue volume to appropriately reconstruct a breast mound ideal for their body frame may have to forgo the benefits of autologous reconstruction and may only have the option for implant-based reconstruction. While implant-based reconstruction is a comparable choice when considering long-term patient satisfaction, this option limits patients that may desire a non-implant-based reconstruction if they do not meet the appropriate criteria [ 8 , 31 ]. Omental fat-augmentation free flap (O-FAFF) reconstruction has been tested as an innovative technique to solve this problem, increasing the population of patients that can be considered candidates for autologous reconstruction by using a combination technique of omental flap harvesting in addition to fat harvesting to increase omental flap volume [ 8 , 23 , 31 ].…”
Section: Current Practices and Methods Of Omental-based Breast Recons...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations