“…Compared to the nonplanar antennas, 9,13,21,37,40,50 the proposed antenna has a relative lower profile and lower configuration. Compared to the antennas with low profile (i.e., height < 0.1λ g ), 22,24,25,39 the proposed antenna has a wider impedance bandwidth, F I G U R E 9 Simulated and measured radiation performances of the antenna prototype, (A) front-to-back ratio, and (B) boresight gain and efficiency higher front-to-back ratio and nearly equal E-and Hplane radiation patterns. In general, it can be concluded that the proposed antenna can exhibit unidirectional radiation with low profile and simple configuration compared to most of the existing complementary dipole antennas.…”