2023
DOI: 10.1111/jvh.13808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel non‐invasive model for the prediction of advanced liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients with NAFLD

Abstract: There are still lack of non-invasive models to evaluate liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to establish a predictive model for advanced fibrosis in these patients. A total of 504 treatmentnaive CHB patients with NAFLD who underwent liver biopsy were enrolled and randomly divided into a training set (n = 336) and a validation set (n = 168). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare predicting accuracy for the diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnostic efficacy was higher than that in our CHB & MASLD group but similar to our results in the CHB & MetALD group, and the cutoff values were higher than those in our CHB and SLD groups 26 . Wang et al 27 demonstrated that the AUC of FIB‐4 was 0.716 (0.656–0.775) when diagnosing ≥F3 fibrosis in patients with CHB & NAFLD (optimal cutoff: 1.343), which was lower than that in this study (0.774 [0.742–0.804]) (optimal cutoff: 1.414). A study by Ratziu et al between NAFLD and MASLD showed that the diagnostic accuracy of FIB‐4 and LSM in evaluating advanced fibrosis in NAFLD and MASLD was almost the same 28 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The diagnostic efficacy was higher than that in our CHB & MASLD group but similar to our results in the CHB & MetALD group, and the cutoff values were higher than those in our CHB and SLD groups 26 . Wang et al 27 demonstrated that the AUC of FIB‐4 was 0.716 (0.656–0.775) when diagnosing ≥F3 fibrosis in patients with CHB & NAFLD (optimal cutoff: 1.343), which was lower than that in this study (0.774 [0.742–0.804]) (optimal cutoff: 1.414). A study by Ratziu et al between NAFLD and MASLD showed that the diagnostic accuracy of FIB‐4 and LSM in evaluating advanced fibrosis in NAFLD and MASLD was almost the same 28 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…MetALD group, and the cutoff values were higher than those in our CHB and SLD groups. 26 Wang et al 27 and NAFLD (AUC = 0.8). 33,34 However, the performance of LSM in…”
Section: Further Comparisons Of Cutoff Values In Each Groupmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An alternate method that has benefits including becoming kinder to the body, safer, and more economical is to use non-invasive diagnostics [ 51 , 52 ]. To forecast liver histological alterations and fibrosis in CHB patients, several non-invasive models were created utilising various indicators [ 53 ], [ 54 ], [ 55 ]. With no requirement for a liver biopsy, these models have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in precisely evaluating liver histology and forecasting the requirement for antiviral medication.…”
Section: Prognostic Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%