Procedings of the Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on DIFFerential Geometry in Computer Vision for Analysis of Sha 2015
DOI: 10.5244/c.29.diffcv.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Riemannian Framework for Shape Analysis of Annotated Surfaces

Abstract: We present a novel, parameterization-invariant method for shape analysis of annotated surfaces. While the method can handle various types of annotation including color and texture, in this paper we focus on soft landmark annotations. Landmark annotations are commonly provided in various applications including medical imaging where an expert marks points of interest on the objects. Most methods in current literature either study shapes using landmarks only or surfaces only. In either case, the analyst is forced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost all studies of these kind presume a preprocessing registration step and so do not consider the inherent variability effects that might be induced by the registration step on the functional measurements. Indeed, this issue goes beyond neuroimaging, as the same techniques are often used in a wide variety of medical imaging settings (Audette et al, 2000), as well as computer vision applications (Zaetz and Kurtek, 2015).…”
Section: Motivating Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all studies of these kind presume a preprocessing registration step and so do not consider the inherent variability effects that might be induced by the registration step on the functional measurements. Indeed, this issue goes beyond neuroimaging, as the same techniques are often used in a wide variety of medical imaging settings (Audette et al, 2000), as well as computer vision applications (Zaetz and Kurtek, 2015).…”
Section: Motivating Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%