2017
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel stent inflation protocol improves long‐term outcomes compared with rapid inflation/deflation deployment method

Abstract: Stent deployment using POP led to reduced TVF compared to rapid I/D. These results recommend this method to improve long-term outcomes. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Cook et al study, stent inflation duration was determined by balloon pressure stability which has since been termed the “pressure optimized protocol” or POP where achieving stability of stent balloon pressure is used as an endpoint to determine the duration of inflation. When this protocol was utilized in a large group of lesions ( n = 615), inflation duration averaged 104 sec (range 30–380) , and was considerably longer than the time in the prolonged duration arms of other studies. Though this technique has not been compared directly with other prolonged duration techniques, it is interesting to note that the inflation time in the shorter duration arm in the Cook et al study (mean duration 46 ± 16 sec) would be considered a “prolonged” duration in the rest of the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Cook et al study, stent inflation duration was determined by balloon pressure stability which has since been termed the “pressure optimized protocol” or POP where achieving stability of stent balloon pressure is used as an endpoint to determine the duration of inflation. When this protocol was utilized in a large group of lesions ( n = 615), inflation duration averaged 104 sec (range 30–380) , and was considerably longer than the time in the prolonged duration arms of other studies. Though this technique has not been compared directly with other prolonged duration techniques, it is interesting to note that the inflation time in the shorter duration arm in the Cook et al study (mean duration 46 ± 16 sec) would be considered a “prolonged” duration in the rest of the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…By increasing stent expansion, prolonged inflation will likely improve long‐term clinical outcomes, particularly decreasing the need for treatment of in‐stent restenosis. In a recent study, patients treated with POP had a significantly lower incidence of repeat target vessel revascularization compared to a contemporaneous group treated by rapid inflation/deflation stent implantation technique . A prospective randomized trial comparing POP with rapid inflation/deflation is required to fully validate the use of POP routinely although the current data are already strong enough to consider use in clinical practice, particularly in view of the results of the current meta‐analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the seminal work by Colombo et al, high pressure stent balloon inflation has been the standard method of stent deployment [ 24 ]. Use of the pressure optimization protocol during stent balloon inflation in a recent study was associated with better long-term outcomes, particularly for target vessel revascularization [ 25 ]. However, duration of stent deflation, and particularly the velocity of balloon deflation, has not received as much attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there is substantial evidence documenting that prolonged inflation (of at least 30 seconds) shows greater stent expansion than shorter inflation times [3–5]. Additionally, interesting mechanism of stent expansion has been shown, assuming that as long as inflation pressure decreases, stent expansion continues [6]. However the optimal protocol for the stent expansion time still needs to be established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%