2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel technology-industry concordance table based on linked inventor-establishment data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To capture firm innovation, we use patent propensity as an outcomerelated innovation measure (Balsmeier et al, 2014;Bernile et al, 2018;Dorner & Harhoff, 2018) Average patent propensity in our data is 0.30; that is, in our sample of firm-year observations, R&D expenditures of 1000 Euros result, on average, in 0.3 patents. Accounting for a possible time lag, we lag our measure of patent propensity by 1 year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To capture firm innovation, we use patent propensity as an outcomerelated innovation measure (Balsmeier et al, 2014;Bernile et al, 2018;Dorner & Harhoff, 2018) Average patent propensity in our data is 0.30; that is, in our sample of firm-year observations, R&D expenditures of 1000 Euros result, on average, in 0.3 patents. Accounting for a possible time lag, we lag our measure of patent propensity by 1 year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture firm innovation, we use patent propensity as an outcome‐related innovation measure (Balsmeier et al, 2014; Bernile et al, 2018; Dorner & Harhoff, 2018) that at the same time is closely linked to a firm's innovation strategy and thus likely to be affected by the supervisory board. By focusing on patents as a more outcome‐related measure of firm innovation, we follow the recent claim by Griffin et al (2021) who argue that studies on the subject should rather focus on outcome‐related instead of input‐related variables of firm innovation, such as, for example, R&D expenditures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we discarded other matching methodologies as they are used less frequently or provide matching for older or different industrial classifications (see Dorner and Harhoff, 2018). Similarly, we decided to rely on the DG Concordance Table and not on newer ones such as those provided by…”
Section: Sectoral Attribution Of Am Patentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lybbert and Zolas (2014) and Dorner and Harhoff (2018), given the lack of empirical testing for these new concordances. More importantly, as shown in Dorner and Harhoff (2018) the three concordance methodologies lead to a highly similar matching of patents to sectors in manufacturing.…”
Section: Sectoral Attribution Of Am Patentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of river sand flushing, for example, a harmonious water-sediment relationship is necessary to maintain a healthy river channel, especially in the sandy region of the Yellow River, which is the study area. During floods, river flow increases and the silt is resuspended and transported downstream [24]. If the river flow is too low during a flood, the silt is difficult to be suspended, which will lead to sediment accumulation, which will cause the river gradient to fall and the river bed to rise, resulting in the phenomenon of overhanging river, threatening the regional flood control safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%