2012
DOI: 10.1142/s0218213012400179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Two Phase Retrieval Mechanism for a Clinical Case Based Reasoning System for Radiotherapy Treatment Planning

Abstract: This paper presents a decision support system for radiotherapy treatment planning for head, neck and brain cancer. The aim of a treatment plan is to apply radiation to kill tumor cells, while minimizing the damage to healthy tissue and critical organs. Since treatment planning is a complex decision making process that relies heavily on the subjective experience of clinicians, we propose the use of case-based reasoning (CBR), in which problems are solved based on the solutions of similar past problems. This pap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experienced planners often know what configurations are suitable for a cancer patient, even when the underlying theory is not thoroughly understood [7].…”
Section: Approaches To Radiotherapy Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Experienced planners often know what configurations are suitable for a cancer patient, even when the underlying theory is not thoroughly understood [7].…”
Section: Approaches To Radiotherapy Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many knowledge-based methods for radiotherapy planning have been developed to decide upon parameters for treatment plans, including the radiation dose plan, beam configuration, beam weight and wedge configuration [2][3][4][5]7]. Such methods aim at utilising knowledge available in the domain and used by the domain end-user to simulate the natural solving process as much as possible.…”
Section: Approaches To Radiotherapy Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations