A Numerical Approach for the Efficient Concept Design of Laser-Based Hybrid Joints

Abstract

Laser-based plastic–metal joints have high potential to enable cost-efficient lightweight structures in multi-material design. By an appropriate load-optimized positioning of the microstructure on the joining zone, cost- and strength-optimized joints can be realized. However, there are no design methods and models to efficiently develop these tailored microstructures. Currently, time-consuming experiments are necessary to find the optimum microstructure concepts. These experiments must be repeated when requirements change, e.g., dimensions of the components. To provide a simple and efficient design tool, this paper presents an automated numerical method for the development of cost- and strength-optimized microstructure concepts for laser-based joining zones. The basis for the approach is a new numerical model which generates concepts for microstructures automatically based only on the stress tensor in the joining zone. A new finite element cohesive zone model (CZM) was developed to estimate the joint strength. The CZM parameters were efficiently derived from a finite element model of a single cavity. To determine the costs, a new model is presented that calculates the production time and the cost for any given microstructure. The models were interconnected in a combined optimization procedure and a genetic algorithm was used to determine cost- and strength-optimized microstructure concepts. The approach was applied to a demonstration example where the laser costs were reduced by up to 67% compared with benchmarks with surface-covering parallel linear cavities. The approach shows high potential for the efficient design of cost- and strength-optimal laser-based hybrid joints since it is fully based on simulation models and iterative experiments in the design stage are eliminated.

Reusable workflows for virtual testing of multidisciplinary products in system models

“…There is a variety of approaches to develop such workflows by interconnecting models and parameters, examples are given in ref. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, these approaches do not address the MBSE approach: There is no link to parameters of the functional architecture and therefore the data is not centrally organized.…”

Automated Identification of Valid Model Networks Using Model-Based Systems Engineering

“…The literature offers a variety of approaches for the creation and identification of valid model networks by interconnecting models and parameters; examples are provided in ref. [17][18][19][20][21][22]. In these approaches, the analysis of model networks in the literature is usually limited to domain-specific tools, model signatures and software interfaces.…”