2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical study of liquid atomization regimes by means of conservative level-set simulations

Abstract: Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC http://upcommons.upc.edu/e-prints Aquesta és una còpia de la versió author's final draft d'un article publicat a la revista Computers & Fluids.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical algorithms have been implemented in a parallel C++/MPI platform called TermoFluids 52 . Furthermore, the unstructured finite‐volume CLS method has been extensively verified and validated with several results from the literature, including dam‐break, 16 rising bubbles, 16,21,53,54 bubbly flows, 17‐19 droplet collision against a fluid‐fluid interface and droplets bouncing collision, 18 thermocapillary‐driven motion of deformable fluid particles, 13 Taylor bubbles, 55 atomization of a liquid‐gas jet, 56,57 non‐Newtonian two‐phase flow, 58 and mass transfer from bubble swarms 19,20 . Therefore, this research can be considered as a further step in the development of numerical methodologies to solve two‐phase flows on complex geometries, with the aid of a finite‐volume/level‐set method introduced by References 13,16,17,19, and an adaptive tetrahedral‐mesh refinement method proposed in this work.…”
Section: Mathematical Model and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical algorithms have been implemented in a parallel C++/MPI platform called TermoFluids 52 . Furthermore, the unstructured finite‐volume CLS method has been extensively verified and validated with several results from the literature, including dam‐break, 16 rising bubbles, 16,21,53,54 bubbly flows, 17‐19 droplet collision against a fluid‐fluid interface and droplets bouncing collision, 18 thermocapillary‐driven motion of deformable fluid particles, 13 Taylor bubbles, 55 atomization of a liquid‐gas jet, 56,57 non‐Newtonian two‐phase flow, 58 and mass transfer from bubble swarms 19,20 . Therefore, this research can be considered as a further step in the development of numerical methodologies to solve two‐phase flows on complex geometries, with the aid of a finite‐volume/level‐set method introduced by References 13,16,17,19, and an adaptive tetrahedral‐mesh refinement method proposed in this work.…”
Section: Mathematical Model and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The newly adapted mesh is obtained from an input mesh through some geometrical manipulations: operations of refinement and coarsening until a maximum level of refinement is achieved. This methodology is a further step to extend our previous work about the development of AMR algorithms on hexahedral meshes 54,56,57,59,60 to tetrahedral meshes for the solution of computational fluid dynamics problems on complex domains.…”
Section: Adaptive Mesh Refinement For Tetrahedral Meshesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…133-137) 67 0 67 Wu et al (1995, fig. 7) 110 0 110 Tang and Masutani (2003) 75 0 75 Schillaci et al (2019) 11 0 11 This work 120 1094 1188…”
Section: Photosmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In past decades, there are many numerical and experimental studies on the atomizer. For example, Eugenio used a conservative level-set to simulate the liquid atomization regimes [7]. Davide developed an improved multiscale Eulerian-Lagrangian method for simulation of the atomization process [8].…”
Section: Fig 1 Medical Nebulizer Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%