A partial wave analysis of the reaction

Albrecht, H.; Hamacher, Thomas; Hofmann, Ralf; Kirchhoff, T.; Mankel, R.; Nau, A.; Nowak, S.; Reßing, D.; Schröder, H.; Schulz, H. D.; Walter, Michael; Wurth, R.; Hast, C.; Kapitza, H.; Kolanoski, H.; Kosche, A.; Lange, A.; Lindner, A.; Schieber, M.; Siegmund, Thomas; Thurn, H.; Töpfer, D.; Wegener, D.; Frankl, C.; Graf, J.; Śchmidtler, M.; Schramm, Michael; Schubert, K. R.; Schwierz, R.; Spaan, B.; Waldi, R.; Reim, K.; Wegener, H.; Eckmann, R.; Kuipers, H.; Mai, O.; Mundt, R.; Oest, T.; Reiner, Robert; Schmidt‐Parzefall, W.; Stiewe, J.; Werner, S.; Ehret, K.; Hofmann, W.; Hüpper, A.; Knöpfle, K. T.; Spengler, J.; Krieger, P.; MacFarlane, D. B.; Prentice, J. D.; Saull, P. R. B.; Tzamariúdaki, K.; Water, R. G. Van de; Yoon, T. S.; Schneider, M.; Weseler, S.; Bračko, M.; Kernel, G.; Križan, P.; Križnič, E.; Medin, G.; Podobnik, T.; Živko, T.; Balagura, V.; Barsuk, S.; Belyaev, I.; Chistov, R.; Danilov, M.; Eiges, V.; Gershtein, L.; Gershtein, Y.; Golutvin, A.; Igonkina, O.; Korolko, I.; Kostina, G.; Litvintsev, D.; Pakhlov, P.; Semenov, S.; Snizhko, A.; Tichomirov, I.; Zaitsev, Yu.

doi:10.1007/s002880050409

Cited by 37 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For those channels with only measured total branching ratios, most of our predictions for the longitudinal branching ratios do not exceed the data, after considering the uncertainties. Our result for the D 0 → K * 0 ω mode is larger than the data, but the measurement of this mode was performed in 1992 [35], and should be updated. It is thus a fair claim that our simple estimates for the D 0 → VV longitudinal amplitudes are satisfactory.…”

Section: Y Vvcontrasting

confidence: 54%

D ⁰ -D̄ ⁰ mixing parameter y in the factorization-assisted topological-amplitude approach

Jiang

Qin

et al. 2018

Chinese Phys. C

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Y Vvcontrasting

confidence: 54%

D ⁰ -D̄ ⁰ mixing parameter y in the factorization-assisted topological-amplitude approach

Jiang

Qin

et al. 2018

Chinese Phys. C

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hence their systematic uncertainties are denoted by different boxes. Right panel: K * 0 /K as a function of collision energy [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The bars and caps (boxes) denote the statistical and systematic uncertainties respectively.…”

Section: Hadronic Phase Lifetimementioning

confidence: 99%

Production of K^∗0 in Au+Au collisions at √S_NN = 19.6 GeV from RHIC BES-II

Sahoo

2023

EPJ Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present the study of K∗0 in Au+Au collisions at √SNN = 19.6 GeV from RHIC BES-II. The ratio of resonanse to non-resonance (K∗0/K) is shown as function of centrality and center-of-mass energy, which implies the dominance of hadronic re-scattering over regeneration in central A+A collisions. The lower limit of hadronic phase lifetime (tkin − tchem) is also reported using a toy model ansartz. The results are compared with previous RHIC and LHC measurements.

show abstract

“…[7] In experiment, the ARGUS collaboration searched for the decay Υ(1S) → D * ± X and set an upper limit on Br[Υ(1S) → D * ± X] < 1.9%. [8] Recently, the BaBar [9] and CLEO collaboration [10] have also made relevant measurements. Among them, the BaBar's results [9] have provided evidence for an excess of D * + production over the expected rate from the virtual photon annihilation process Υ(1S) → γ * → D * + X.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Charmed-Hadron Production in ϒ(1 S ) Semi-inclusive Decay

Chen¹,

Sang²,

Wu³

2012

Commun. Theor. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the framework of the NRQCD factorization formalism, we calculate the decay rate for the process Υ(1S) → ccgg to the next-to-leading order (NLO) in the relative velocity v of the b quark in the bottomonium rest frame. We also study the momentum distributions of the charm quark and the charmed-hadron in the decay. The momentum distribution of the charmed-hadron is obtained by convolving the charm quark momentum distribution with a fragmentation function of the charm quark into the hadron. In addition, we fit the nonperturbative NRQCD matrix element v 2 Υ through comparing the theoretical prediction with the measurement from the BaBar collaboration for the decay rate of Υ(1S) → D * + X. In return, taking this matrix element as an input parameter, we predict the decay rates as well as the momentum distributions for a collection of charmed-hadrons in the process Υ(1S) → ccgg → hX.

show abstract

A partial wave analysis of the reaction

Cited by 37 publications

References 0 publications

D ⁰ -D̄ ⁰ mixing parameter y in the factorization-assisted topological-amplitude approach

D ⁰ -D̄ ⁰ mixing parameter y in the factorization-assisted topological-amplitude approach

Production of K^∗0 in Au+Au collisions at √S_NN = 19.6 GeV from RHIC BES-II

Charmed-Hadron Production in ϒ(1 S ) Semi-inclusive Decay

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

A partial wave analysis of the reaction

Cited by 37 publications

References 0 publications

D 0 -D̄ 0 mixing parameter y in the factorization-assisted topological-amplitude approach

D 0 -D̄ 0 mixing parameter y in the factorization-assisted topological-amplitude approach

Production of K∗0 in Au+Au collisions at √SNN = 19.6 GeV from RHIC BES-II

Charmed-Hadron Production in ϒ(1 S ) Semi-inclusive Decay

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

D ⁰ -D̄ ⁰ mixing parameter y in the factorization-assisted topological-amplitude approach

D ⁰ -D̄ ⁰ mixing parameter y in the factorization-assisted topological-amplitude approach

Production of K^∗0 in Au+Au collisions at √S_NN = 19.6 GeV from RHIC BES-II