2021
DOI: 10.1002/anr3.12125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A patient‐centred approach to sequential elective caesarean section and total thyroidectomy

Abstract: Sequential surgery (i.e. consecutive procedures within the same operating theatre admission) poses challenges which demand multidisciplinary teamwork. Subspecialist anaesthetic expertise is required, different surgical teams need to coordinate patient care, and most importantly, the patient's wishes must be taken into consideration.We describe the management of a woman who underwent sequential elective caesarean section and total thyroidectomy at 38 weeks gestation in whom a thyroid carcinoma had been diagnose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two ways to achieve this: patients can act as authors, either alone or in collaboration with the healthcare professionals involved in their care; or the patient can provide some text which can be included in the report as an excerpt [e.g. 14,15]. Patient authorship arguably makes the report more powerful because it places the patient perspective at the heart of the manuscript, but patient authors should weigh up the potential benefits of this approach against the possible undesirable impacts of authorship including publicity that the article may attract; loss of confidentiality and requirement to be accountable for the content of the paper.…”
Section: How To Maximise Value For the Readermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two ways to achieve this: patients can act as authors, either alone or in collaboration with the healthcare professionals involved in their care; or the patient can provide some text which can be included in the report as an excerpt [e.g. 14,15]. Patient authorship arguably makes the report more powerful because it places the patient perspective at the heart of the manuscript, but patient authors should weigh up the potential benefits of this approach against the possible undesirable impacts of authorship including publicity that the article may attract; loss of confidentiality and requirement to be accountable for the content of the paper.…”
Section: How To Maximise Value For the Readermentioning
confidence: 99%