2021
DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2021.1949459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot study of core body temperatures in healthcare workers wearing personal protective equipment in a high-level isolation unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This T re limit is within the range of general recommendation of measures against excessive heat strain by ACGIH regarding the body core temperature of 38.0 • C for unselected unacclimatised workers and 38.5 for medically selected and acclimatized personnel [32]. In similar studies on work in PPE in hot environments, comparable maximum body core temperatures above 38 [35], or even up to 39.9 • C [36] were observed in the real work environment. For extreme situations, the PTS tool presents a limit of T re = 39 • C also, which is completely unbearable for most PPE users and can even be considered as a highly health-threatening condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This T re limit is within the range of general recommendation of measures against excessive heat strain by ACGIH regarding the body core temperature of 38.0 • C for unselected unacclimatised workers and 38.5 for medically selected and acclimatized personnel [32]. In similar studies on work in PPE in hot environments, comparable maximum body core temperatures above 38 [35], or even up to 39.9 • C [36] were observed in the real work environment. For extreme situations, the PTS tool presents a limit of T re = 39 • C also, which is completely unbearable for most PPE users and can even be considered as a highly health-threatening condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Therefore, we opted for the T core , T sk , and HR parameters as sensitive physiological indicators, which aligns with prior research. 31,32…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we opted for the T core , T sk , and HR parameters as sensitive physiological indicators, which aligns with prior research. 31,32 Prediction of Safe Working Hours Gray system theory possesses unparalleled advantages in addressing low-information and small sample fuzzy systems. A DGM(1,1) model, the first-order univariate model, provides a theoretical foundation for transforming the DGM(1,1) model into a continuous form, thus increasing its prediction capacity.…”
Section: Selection Of Physiological Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key risks related to PPE in HLIUs include impairment of occupational well-being, performance and contamination of PPE, or the environment during donning, doffing and care 40. A previous investigation demonstrated raised core body temperature in HCWs performing care in an HLIU, a subset of whom reported symptoms of heat exhaustion 41. Another investigation demonstrated that HCWs experience an increase in physical load while doffing PPE 40.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 40 A previous investigation demonstrated raised core body temperature in HCWs performing care in an HLIU, a subset of whom reported symptoms of heat exhaustion. 41 Another investigation demonstrated that HCWs experience an increase in physical load while doffing PPE. 40 Restricting the number of hours HCWs are permitted to wear PPE and including balancing aids are strategies that have been employed to mitigate the physical effects of PPE on HCWs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%