2014
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/12/2513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot study of the nocturnal respiration rates in COPD patients in the home environment using a non-contact biomotion sensor

Abstract: Nocturnal respiration rate parameters were collected from 20 COPD subjects over an 8 week period, to determine if changes in respiration rate were associated with exacerbations of COPD. These subjects were primarily GOLD Class 2 to 4, and had been recently discharged from hospital following a recent exacerbation. The respiration rates were collected using a non-contact radio-frequency biomotion sensor which senses respiratory effort and body movement using a short-range radio-frequency sensor. An adaptive notc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In monitoring device validation, it is desired to assess both intersubject and intrasubject variation, ideally encompassing repeatability and reliability across multiple nights. A limitation of this study (but one shared by precedent validation studies involving polygraphy [ 8 , 15 ]) is that each participant undertook one night of monitoring with both the Albus system and reference. This was in large part due to the practical limitations of the gold-standard polygraphy, which is burdensome and poorly suitable for multiple nights, especially for children, but also a study design choice where given the same resource, it was hypothesised that performance was more likely to vary between different participants, rather than the accuracy for a given participant’s night significantly changing if it was repeated for the same person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In monitoring device validation, it is desired to assess both intersubject and intrasubject variation, ideally encompassing repeatability and reliability across multiple nights. A limitation of this study (but one shared by precedent validation studies involving polygraphy [ 8 , 15 ]) is that each participant undertook one night of monitoring with both the Albus system and reference. This was in large part due to the practical limitations of the gold-standard polygraphy, which is burdensome and poorly suitable for multiple nights, especially for children, but also a study design choice where given the same resource, it was hypothesised that performance was more likely to vary between different participants, rather than the accuracy for a given participant’s night significantly changing if it was repeated for the same person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy was analysed and reported for periods starting from when each participant was in bed and there were ten minutes of respiratory data without gross motion from both the Albus system and polygraphy. As per precedent validation methodology [ 15 ], a 15-minute period was counted and compared for each participant to assess the inter- and intrasubject performance. A RR reading from the Albus system was defined as accurate when within ±2 breaths per minute of the reference count as per criteria used in previous work [ 8 , 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods, based on self-reported symptoms or manually entered data [6][7][8][9][10] are limited, since they depend on subjective assessment and on patient compliance. Others have been focusing in remote monitoring devices, enabling automatic follow-up of physiological data and reducing the need for intervention for data acquisition by patients or the health team [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Some of the methods described employ an online learning process, that can be considered as a novelty detection approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The devices are demonstrated to monitor the variation of humidity content on exhaled and inhaled air during breathing without requiring any external power. Therefore, these sensors can be used for continuous monitoring of breathing pattern to detect many critical diseases, such as sleep apnea, asthma, pneumonia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPDs). Monitoring moisture level at the wound site can also help in deciding a suitable type of dressing and tracking the healing process continuously . These sensors were used to map the lateral variation of moisture level for monitoring wound healing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%