2018
DOI: 10.1130/g40254.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A positive test for the Greater Tarim Block at the heart of Rodinia: Mega-dextral suturing of supercontinent assembly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Abbreviations are defined in the caption to Fig. 4. cratons split away and returned during the late Mesoproterozoic during a limited geographical reorganisation to form Rodinia (Pisarevsky et al, 2014;Wen et al, 2018;Mulder et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Metamorphic Record and Time's Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbreviations are defined in the caption to Fig. 4. cratons split away and returned during the late Mesoproterozoic during a limited geographical reorganisation to form Rodinia (Pisarevsky et al, 2014;Wen et al, 2018;Mulder et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Metamorphic Record and Time's Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…930-920 Ma. As shown in our figure 1A (Wen et al, 2018), most of these data define the proposed suture zone. To explain sporadic data plotting outside the suture zone, simplified as depicted, we emphasize that our proposed highly transcurrent collisional geometry is naturally expected to generate strike-slip duplication of early collisional structures in an anastomosing array.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…We thank Song and Li (2018) for their Comment on our paper (Wen et al, 2018) concerning the geological evidence in support of our model of Rodinia amalgamation and formation, which places the Greater Tarim Block (GTB) at the heart of the supercontinent. In this Reply, we respond to each aspect of the criticisms of Song and Li and conclude that our hypothesis remains viable at present understanding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Most paleomagnetic studies, in agreement with plumerelated magmatic rocks and glacial intervals, support the placement of the Tarim craton to the north or west of Australia in Neoproterozoic reconstructions of Rodinia [1][2][3][4]. In contrast, some authors [5][6][7] argue for a "missing link" con-figuration of the Tarim craton at the heart of the unified Rodinia supercontinent between Australia and Laurentia, based on early Neoproterozoic to early Ediacaran paleomagnetic and tectonostratigraphic data from the Tarim craton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%