A practical approach to identifying maternal deaths missed from routine hospital reports: lessons from Indonesia

Abstract

BackgroundAccurate estimates of the number of maternal deaths in both the community and facility are important, in order to allocate adequate resources to address such deaths. On the other hand, current studies show that routine methods of identifying maternal deaths in facilities underestimate the number by more than one-half.ObjectiveTo assess the utility of a new approach to identifying maternal deaths in hospitals.MethodDeaths of women of reproductive age were retrospectively identified from registers in two district hospitals in Indonesia over a 24-month period. Based on information retrieved, deaths were classified as ‘maternal’ or ‘non-maternal’ where possible. For deaths that remained unclassified, a detailed case note review was undertaken and the extracted data were used to facilitate classification.ResultsOne hundred and fifty-five maternal deaths were identified, mainly from the register review. Only 67 maternal deaths were recorded in the hospitals’ routine reports over the same period. This underestimation of maternal deaths was partly due to the incomplete coverage of the routine reporting system; however, even in the wards where routine reports were made, the study identified twice as many deaths.ConclusionThe RAPID method is a practical method that provides a more complete estimate of hospital maternal mortality than routine reporting systems.

Easier said than done!: methodological challenges with conducting maternal death review research in Malawi

“…Therefore, our finding of 32 maternal deaths could be an underestimation, which has been indicated in previous hospital studies [23,24]. …”

What you count is what you target: the implications of maternal death classification for tracking progress towards reducing maternal mortality in developing countries

“…25 Indirect maternal deaths were particularly likely to be missed because they often occurred in wards outside the maternity area and were frequently reported as nonmaternal deaths. 26,27 Given the underreporting observed in institutions where record-keeping is theoretically in place, it may be expected that direct and especially indirect maternal deaths in the community would be underreported to an even greater extent. Furthermore, in developing countries, where access to health-care services is limited, it is often the case that the majority of deaths occur in the community and not in a hospital or health centre.…”

Facility‐based review of 296 maternal deaths at a tertiary centre in India: Could they be prevented?

“…In practice, hospitals' routine reports on maternal deaths are based on information collected from the Department of Obstetrics. MDR limiting to only obstetrics wards underestimates MMR by one‐half to two‐thirds …”