2022
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.886722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Guide to Causal Mediation Analysis: Illustration With a Comprehensive College Transition Program and Nonprogram Peer and Faculty Interactions

Abstract: Experimental and quasi-experimental designs have been increasingly employed in education. Mediation analysis has long been used to measure the role of mediators. Causal mediation analysis provides a modern approach to evaluate potential causal roles of mediators. Compared with conventional mediation analysis, causal mediation analysis has several advantages, e.g., by enabling us to evaluate necessary assumptions to establish a valid causal role of the mediator of interest. Despite these advantages and the avai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30 Unlike conventional mediation analysis, causal mediation analysis attempts to better infer causality by focussing on nonparametric definitions of causal mediation effects, and is better able to achieve confounder control than conventional mediation analysis. 31 It can also accommodate both linear and non-linear models and both continuous and discrete mediator/outcome variables. 31 The analysis for the present study was specifically carried out using a 'potential outcomes' framework via the Stata/ MP 16 'mediation' package, which estimates mediation effects using Monte Carlo simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30 Unlike conventional mediation analysis, causal mediation analysis attempts to better infer causality by focussing on nonparametric definitions of causal mediation effects, and is better able to achieve confounder control than conventional mediation analysis. 31 It can also accommodate both linear and non-linear models and both continuous and discrete mediator/outcome variables. 31 The analysis for the present study was specifically carried out using a 'potential outcomes' framework via the Stata/ MP 16 'mediation' package, which estimates mediation effects using Monte Carlo simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 It can also accommodate both linear and non-linear models and both continuous and discrete mediator/outcome variables. 31 The analysis for the present study was specifically carried out using a 'potential outcomes' framework via the Stata/ MP 16 'mediation' package, which estimates mediation effects using Monte Carlo simulations. 30 32 33 This works by simulating predicted values of a specified mediator or outcome variable and then calculating appropriate quantities of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Causal mediation analysis, as a method, plays an important role in helping to determine how and why particular treatment effects arise by helping researchers to identify intermediate variables that occur in the pathway between a given treatment and a given outcome [32]. Moreover, causal mediation analysis, in general, has multiple advantages over conventional mediation methods, such as allowing for the evaluation of necessary assumptions to ascertain the causal role of the mediator variable of interest [33]. The analysis for the present study was specifically carried out using a ‘potential outcomes’ framework via the Stata/MP 16 ‘ mediation ’ package, which estimates mediation effects using Monte Carlo simulations [32, 34, 35].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the principal component factor analysis, the largest variance explained does not account for a majority of the variance (>50%), and in that case, it turns out that the CMB of this study does not pose a severe threat to our results. The analytic approach was then conducted in four steps, as recommended by Chi et al (2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%