2003
DOI: 10.1081/jbc-120024624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Preliminary Study to Assess Possible Chromosomal Damage Among Users of Digital Mobile Phones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies (Juutilainen et al 2010;Hintzsche and Stopper 2010) came to the conclusion that nonionizing radiation exposure could not be related to any genotoxic action, although several studies have reported effects with different genotoxic end points such as sister chromatid exchange (Gadhia et al 2003), micronuclei (Gandhi and Singh 2005a;Gandhi and Anita 2005b;Yadav OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval v 2 test was used for comparison of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotype distribution among the control and exposed groups Arch Environ Contam Toxicol * Significant at p \ 0.05. Multivariate analysis of covariance tests was used for the differences in tail moment value (TM) and BMN frequency adjusted with age, sex, consumption habits and exposure duration among exposed and control groups separately Arch Environ Contam Toxicol and Sharma 2008), CAs (Lalic et al 2001;Othman et al 2003), and DNA strand breakage or comet assay (Sun et al 2006a, b, c;Garaj-Vrhovac and Orescanin 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies (Juutilainen et al 2010;Hintzsche and Stopper 2010) came to the conclusion that nonionizing radiation exposure could not be related to any genotoxic action, although several studies have reported effects with different genotoxic end points such as sister chromatid exchange (Gadhia et al 2003), micronuclei (Gandhi and Singh 2005a;Gandhi and Anita 2005b;Yadav OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval v 2 test was used for comparison of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotype distribution among the control and exposed groups Arch Environ Contam Toxicol * Significant at p \ 0.05. Multivariate analysis of covariance tests was used for the differences in tail moment value (TM) and BMN frequency adjusted with age, sex, consumption habits and exposure duration among exposed and control groups separately Arch Environ Contam Toxicol and Sharma 2008), CAs (Lalic et al 2001;Othman et al 2003), and DNA strand breakage or comet assay (Sun et al 2006a, b, c;Garaj-Vrhovac and Orescanin 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The potential genotoxicity of RF-EMR has been assessed in human epidemiological studies that have shown both positive (Gadhia et al 2003;Markova et al 2005;Gandhi and Anita 2005b) and negative reports (Garson et al 1991;Maes et al 2006). Therefore, there is a need to evaluate different exposed populations with a variety of genotoxic parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is growing evidence for nonthermal effects of MWs that suggests possible relationship of MW exposure with adverse health effects [Navarro et al, 2003;Santini et al, 2003;Hallberg and Johansson, 2004], immune response in human lymphocytes [Dabrowski et al, 2003], permeability of BBB in rat brains [Persson et al, 1997], increase in calcium ion efflux and ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity in brains of exposed rats [Paulraj and Behari, 2002], release of manganese and zinc ions in the serum of the exposed rats [Aksen et al, 2004], decreases in the reproductive capacity of Drosophila melanogaster [Panagopoulos et al, 2004], formation of dicentric chromosomes among mobile users [Gadhia et al, 2003], gene expression in human skin fibroblasts [Pacini et al, 2002], and stress response in human epithelial amnion (AMA) cells [Kwee et al, 2001]. Recent data provided evidence for neuronal damage in both the cortex, the hippocampus and the basal ganglia in the brains of exposed rats [Salford et al, 2003;Ilhan et al, 2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies observed significant increases in dicentric chromosomes (among smoker-alcoholic mobile users), sister chromatid exchanges (synergistic action with mitomycin C) [6], micro-nucleation and DNA strand breaks [7] in blood lymphocytes obtained from mobile phone users. A significant increase in erythrocyte micronuclei frequency was observed in newborn pups of mother rats maintained under 834 MHz EMF exposure at a SAR of 1.23 W/kg for 8.5 h per day throughout the gestation period [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%