2008 4th International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices 2008
DOI: 10.1109/nwesp.2008.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Proposed Architecture for Learning Object Selection and Discovery Based on WSMO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, there are several approaches proposed to provide semantic support to the web services as explained in [11], for example, Resource Description Framework (RDF) [12] and [13], Web Ontology Language for Services (OWL-S) [14] and [15], and Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO) [17]. OWL-S and WSMO are the most prominent frameworks.…”
Section: Scope and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are several approaches proposed to provide semantic support to the web services as explained in [11], for example, Resource Description Framework (RDF) [12] and [13], Web Ontology Language for Services (OWL-S) [14] and [15], and Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO) [17]. OWL-S and WSMO are the most prominent frameworks.…”
Section: Scope and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, several frameworks have been developed to help provide the environment of building semantic projects. As mentioned in Chapter 1 of this thesis, Resource Description Framework (RDF) introduced in [12] and [13], Web Ontology Language for Services (OWL-S) introduced in [14] and [15], and Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO) [17] are most outstanding frameworks. These concepts will be explained in further detail in the following paragraphs.…”
Section: Comparison Between Wsmo and Other Sws Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hanafy [18] presented a new approach -as shown in figure 4 -adding a new compact layer which functioned as an abstract layer for all learning objects hosted by some provider of learning objects (LOP) i.e. this layer represented all types and classes hosted by each LOP semantically.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%