A Proposed Minimum Standard Set of Outcome Measures for Cataract Surgery

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Aligning outcome measures for cataract surgery, one of the most frequently performed procedures globally, may facilitate international comparisons that can drive improvements in the outcomes most meaningful to patients. OBJECTIVE To propose a minimum standard set of outcome measures for cataract surgery that enables global comparisons. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A working group of international experts in cataract outcomes and registries was convened, along with a patient advocate, to agree on a consensus of outcome measures for cataract surgery. In a modified Delphi process, the group met regularly between November 10, 2012, and November 21, 2013, to discuss which outcomes to include in a standard set. Included factors were based on extant literature, existing registries, and the experience of group members. Similarly, a series of consensus discussions were held to determine a set of risk factors to be gathered for each patient. The final shortlist was compiled into a standard set. Analysis was performed from November 22, 2013, to April 5, 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Development of a recommended standard set encompassing preoperative metrics including patient risk factors, intraoperative factors including surgical complications, and postoperative cataract surgery outcomes. RESULTS The recommended standard set encompasses all patients treated for cataracts by 1 of 4 surgical approaches (phacoemulsification, sutured manual extracapsular cataract extraction, sutureless manual extracapsular cataract extraction, or intracapsular cataract extraction). The recommended metrics to be recorded preoperatively include demographics, ocular history and comorbidities, preoperative visual acuity, and patient-reported visual function. The recommended outcomes were split into intraoperative and postoperative metrics. Intraoperative outcomes include capsule-related problems, dislocation of lens nucleus fragments into the vitreous, and other complications. Postoperative outcomes include visual acuity, refractive error, patient-reported visual function, and early and late complications of surgery. The suggested follow-up for collection of postoperative outcomes is up to 3 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE A minimum standard set of outcome measures for cataract surgery is important for meaningful comparison across contexts. The proposed data set is a compromise between all useful data and the practicalities of data collection.

Patient‐reported outcomes in cirrhosis: A scoping review of the literature

“…As this group has identified, new reporting standards may increase the demands for data collection on frontline providers. Implementation is an unresolved challenge for the growing experience with PRO sets . In addition to the work on PRO identification, implementation efforts designed with sensitivity to clinician workflow are necessary.…”

“…Implementation is an unresolved challenge for the growing experience with PRO sets. (19)(20)(21) In addition to the work on PRO identification, implementation efforts designed with sensitivity to clinician workflow are necessary. The optimal quality measure is clinically meaningful, standardized, and easily measured while neither overburdening the frontline clinician (and patient) nor increasing the costs of health care delivery.…”

Standardising the cataract referral process for public hospitals: perspectives of optometrists in New South Wales, Australia

“…19 The Catquest-9SF 15 is administered routinely in Sweden for the National Cataract Surgery Register and is recommended by the International Consortium of Health Outcomes Measurement as part of the minimum dataset for patientreported outcomes for cataract surgery. 21 It was reassuring that a majority (75 per cent) of respondents indicated they were willing to include a validated patient questionnaire assessing the subjective visual function. Respondents who did not want to administer the questionnaire cited time constraints Figure 3.…”

Developing standards for the development of glaucoma virtual clinics using a modified Delphi approach

“…Third, assigning a ‘score’ to the level of agreement facilitates a statistical approach to quantifying consensus 18. This method has been used in ophthalmology to develop competencies for UK optometrists involved in glaucoma shared care,17 to identify areas of consensus and disagreement in paediatric cataract management19 and to define the minimum set of outcome measures required following cataract surgery 20…”