2002
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2002.596.54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

€˜PYRIAM’: A NEW PEAR ROOTSTOCK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty-one clones were established in vitro between 2012 and 2014 from field plots of the pear rootstocks breeding program, oriented to select the most tolerant to iron chlorosis after being grafted with the commercial variety 'Conference' and in comparison with Cydonia oblonga 'BA29' [2,23]. Twenty of these clones were derived from interspecific crosses between OH11, also named 'Pyriam' [24], and four Pyrus species, namely P. amygdaliformis (Pa), P. amygdaliformis spp persica (Pap), P. communis spp cordata (Pcc), and P. elaeagrifolia (Pe). These Pyrus parents were selected for their higher field tolerance to iron-chlorosis, drought, hot summers and sandy soil than P. communis [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-one clones were established in vitro between 2012 and 2014 from field plots of the pear rootstocks breeding program, oriented to select the most tolerant to iron chlorosis after being grafted with the commercial variety 'Conference' and in comparison with Cydonia oblonga 'BA29' [2,23]. Twenty of these clones were derived from interspecific crosses between OH11, also named 'Pyriam' [24], and four Pyrus species, namely P. amygdaliformis (Pa), P. amygdaliformis spp persica (Pap), P. communis spp cordata (Pcc), and P. elaeagrifolia (Pe). These Pyrus parents were selected for their higher field tolerance to iron-chlorosis, drought, hot summers and sandy soil than P. communis [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively low values of affi nity were exhibited by the 'Pyriam' rootstock. The reason for these low fi gures is not obvious as both Simard (2002) and Iglesias (2011a) report high affi nity for 'Pyriam' (OH11). These results rather imply some technical problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rootstock was cross-bred in France (P. nivalis x P. heterofolia). It can be characterised as tolerant of or resistant to fi re blight (Erwinia amylovora (Burrill) Winslow et al), shows good affi nity and does not branch in the nursery (Simard, et al, 2002). 'OHxF 333' (Brokmal) -(supplied by VŠÚO Holovousy s.r.o.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second search of PO and FS was carried out by refining the inference criteria (in this case using k and IBD0 values for 95% of the newly confirmed relationships), and were again confirmed by Mendelian test (<1.5% error rate). New PO and FS relationships were compared with the literature ( Hedrick et al 1921 ; Jacob 1998 ; Mielke and Smith 2002 ; Simard and Michelesi 2002 ; Pasqualini et al 2006 ; Sawamura et al 2008 ; Bassil and Postman 2010 ; Postman et al 2013 ; Bell et al 2014 ; Morgan 2015 ) and the information stored at the NCGR website ( https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/20721500/catalogs/pyrcult.html ) regarding year and country of origin and believed parentage, when available. Pedigree networks were designed with the R package network v1.13 ( Butts 2008 ) and with the software Helium ( Shaw et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%