2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-8809-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A QFD-based approach to support sustainable product-service systems conceptual design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic change of CRs refers to the change of requirements that have been put forward by customers in terms of product functions, performance, and structure, including the addition, deletion, and modification of product functions and structures. Through the "requirement-structure" analysis method (such as QFD [28,29]), designers can complete the transformation of customer requirements to product characteristic parameters. Module and module characteristic values that require a variant design can be determined by product characteristic parameters.…”
Section: Customer Dynamic Requirements Acquisition and Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic change of CRs refers to the change of requirements that have been put forward by customers in terms of product functions, performance, and structure, including the addition, deletion, and modification of product functions and structures. Through the "requirement-structure" analysis method (such as QFD [28,29]), designers can complete the transformation of customer requirements to product characteristic parameters. Module and module characteristic values that require a variant design can be determined by product characteristic parameters.…”
Section: Customer Dynamic Requirements Acquisition and Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personalized template based on a collaborative algorithm (Stormer, 2009) Considering the difference among users, but the parameters are still given from the perspective of product domain Dynamic acquisition system framework (Kreutler and Jannach, 2006;Miceli et al, 2007) Component toolbox (Von Hippel and Katz, 2002) Not suitable for complex product Fuzzy frame, fuzzy level analysis, KJ method, fishbone diagram, and kano model (Bamford and Greatbanks, 2005;He et al, 2015;Sousa-Zomer and Miguel, 2017).…”
Section: Model Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are five main areas in QFD adapted in this study as the reference standard: "whats," "hows," relationships between "whats" and "hows," weight for each evaluation criterion, and evaluation criteria scores (Figure 2). QFD has been used successfully to support many areas such as strategic maintenance technique selection [48], upgrading the service quality of mobile banking [49], as professional skill indicators [50], service quality assessment design [51], PSS design [52], in advanced biofuel policies in which a novel method was applied [53], evaluation of the performance of industrial waste environmental service providers [54], and in monitoring the quality of ready-mixed concrete (RMC) [55].…”
Section: Building the Reference Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%