2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2009.00620.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qualitative exploration of communication within the community mental health team

Abstract: This qualitative study sought to explore conceptual models employed by community mental health team (CMHT) staff in the care of their clients and how CMHT clinicians communicated with one another, particularly in relation to complex clinical work. The qualitative method of interpretive phenomenological analysis was used, and semistructured in-depth interviews with seven UK CMHT clinicians were conducted and analyzed. Four themes were evident in the data and showed that clinicians face complex and competing dem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As well, additional exploration of the role of the nurse within the multidisciplinary team and the influence of postgraduate education on developing alternative conceptual models to underpin contemporary care delivery is indicated. These areas of foci are supported by the findings of the recently published study of Donnison et al . (2009) which uncovered the complex and challenging nature of community mental health work and pointed to the need for further research to explore understandings of conceptual models across disciplines and approaches to community mental health team work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As well, additional exploration of the role of the nurse within the multidisciplinary team and the influence of postgraduate education on developing alternative conceptual models to underpin contemporary care delivery is indicated. These areas of foci are supported by the findings of the recently published study of Donnison et al . (2009) which uncovered the complex and challenging nature of community mental health work and pointed to the need for further research to explore understandings of conceptual models across disciplines and approaches to community mental health team work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It was encouraging to see, at least from the point of view of community‐based nurses, that their perceived direct interaction with GPs on physical health issues is common. The lower frequency of physical health discussions with GPs for inpatient nurses is likely explained by the priority inpatient nurses give to immediate needs related to crisis response and symptom management (Cleary, ), the fragmentation between inpatient and community services (Donnison et al., ), and ambivalence about whether physical health care is part of the mental health nursing role (Happell, Scott, et al., ). By nature of their role, community nurses interact more frequently with primary healthcare services including GPs (Henderson et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, trials of nurse‐based care tend to be localized and the day‐to‐day collaboration in mental healthcare settings between nurses and their healthcare colleagues is not addressed. Inpatient nursing is characterized by uncertainties in many aspects of the professional role, lack of resources, and different principles of care (Cleary, ), and nurse experiences in community mental health are very similar (Donnison, Thompson, & Turpin, ; Henderson, Willis, Walter, & Toffoli, ). These work environments may limit how much nurses examine physical health issues of consumers with SMI and communicate with their colleagues about these issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it ideally suited to investigating topics where there is little existing research. Qualitative research methods have been used successfully in previous studies of communication and relationships within CMHTs (Donnison et al, 2009) and other health care teams (Propp et al, 2010).…”
Section: Qualitative Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%