2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejc.2008.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quasisymmetric function for matroids

Abstract: A new isomorphism invariant of matroids is introduced, in the form of a quasisymmetric function. This invariant• defines a Hopf morphism from the Hopf algebra of matroids to the quasisymmetric functions, which is surjective if one uses rational coefficients, • is a multivariate generating function for integer weight vectors that give minimum total weight to a unique base of the matroid, • is equivalent, via the Hopf antipode, to a generating function for integer weight vectors which keeps track of how many bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
130
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many other natural matroid functions were later discovered to be valuative. [AFR10,BJR09,Der09]. An example of a very general valuation on matroid polytopes from [AFR10] is the formal sum R(M ) = A⊆E R A,r(A) of symbols of the form R S,k where S is a subset of E and k is an integer.…”
Section: Matroid Subdivisions Valuations and The Derksen-fink Invarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other natural matroid functions were later discovered to be valuative. [AFR10,BJR09,Der09]. An example of a very general valuation on matroid polytopes from [AFR10] is the formal sum R(M ) = A⊆E R A,r(A) of symbols of the form R S,k where S is a subset of E and k is an integer.…”
Section: Matroid Subdivisions Valuations and The Derksen-fink Invarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proves that the Ehrhart polynomial cannot be computed using deletion and contractions, as is the case for the Tutte polynomial. Examples BJR1 and BJR2 show that the Ehrhart polynomial of a matroid may help to distinguish nonisomorphic matroids: These two matroids are not isomorphic yet they have the same Tutte polynomials and the same quasi-symmetric function studied in [8]. Although they share some properties, there does not seem to be an obvious relation to Speyer's univariate polynomials introduced in [36]; examples Speyer1 and Speyer2 show they are relatively prime with their corresponding Ehrhart polynomials.…”
Section: Algebraic Properties Of H * -Vectors and Ehrhart Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Since previous authors proposed other invariants of a matroid (e.g., the Tutte polynomials and the invariants of [8,36]) we wished to know how well the Ehrhart polynomial distinguishes nonisomorphic matroids. It is natural to compare it with other known invariants.…”
Section: Algebraic Properties Of H * -Vectors and Ehrhart Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by these graph invariants, Billera, Jia and Reiner defined a quasisymmetric function which is an invariant for matroids (see [3]). This invariant will be discussed later.…”
Section: ) We Define Another Symmetric Function H[x] = H[x](q T) Wimentioning
confidence: 99%