2010
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A radiotherapy planning study of RapidArc, intensity modulated radiotherapy, three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and parallel opposed beams in the treatment of pediatric retroperitoneal tumors

Abstract: POP resulted in favorable MU, treatment time and dosimetry but had poor conformality. 3D-CRT was more conformal but had higher MU and treatment time. RapidArc and cIMRT were generally no better dosimetrically than conformal techniques. RapidArc was dosimetrically very similar to cIMRT, but resulted in a major reduction in time and MU used to deliver the radiation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 presents a synopsis of delivery parameters from recent reports that addressed the role of VMAT for the treatment of abdominal tumors, compared with the findings of the current study. It is clear that the MU/Gy in our IMRT plans was much less than that reported in other studies, although the target volumes, planning objectives and dose per fraction were different in these studies [7, 14, 15]. In addition, the MU/Gy in our VMAT plans was within the wide range that has been previously reported [7, 14, 15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 4 presents a synopsis of delivery parameters from recent reports that addressed the role of VMAT for the treatment of abdominal tumors, compared with the findings of the current study. It is clear that the MU/Gy in our IMRT plans was much less than that reported in other studies, although the target volumes, planning objectives and dose per fraction were different in these studies [7, 14, 15]. In addition, the MU/Gy in our VMAT plans was within the wide range that has been previously reported [7, 14, 15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…It is clear that the MU/Gy in our IMRT plans was much less than that reported in other studies, although the target volumes, planning objectives and dose per fraction were different in these studies [7, 14, 15]. In addition, the MU/Gy in our VMAT plans was within the wide range that has been previously reported [7, 14, 15]. Therefore the difference in the MU increase is mainly related to the number of MU in the IMRT plans, and not to the number of MU in the VMAT plans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A planning study by Shaffer et al [157] evaluated single arc VMAT in 8 paediatric cases with retroperitoneal tumours in comparison with 7-field fixed field IMRT (SW), 3D-CRT and a parallel-opposed pair (POP) plan. VMAT and IMRT were able to achieve improved conformity and lower dose to the liver compared with 3D-CRT and POP, but at the expense of greater MU usage.…”
Section: Paediatric Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a dosedependent risk of late effects on normal tissues such as the liver and kidneys, which may lie adjacent to the target volume and incidentally be included in the high-dose irradiated volume. There have been many developments in the planning and delivery of radiotherapy in recent years, including the use of intensity modulated radiotherapy, which has the potential to improve the conformity of dose distributions, potentially enabling dose escalation to tumors and reduction of toxicity to organs at risk [92,93]. The use of these techniques within pediatric oncology has been controversial, owing to the potential increase in secondary malignancies because of the increased low dose to nontarget tissues [94,95].…”
Section: Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 98%