2013
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomised trial of high and low pressure level settings on an adjustable ventriculoperitoneal shunt valve for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: results of the Dutch evaluation programme Strata shunt (DEPSS) trial

Abstract: On the basis of this multicentre prospective randomised trial it is to be recommended to treat patients with INPH with a shunt with an adjustable valve, preset at the highest opening pressure and lowered until clinical improvement or radiological signs of overdrainage occur although slower improvement and more shunt adjustments might be the consequence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
24
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In Boon and colleagues' study, 2 the clinical effect of shunt treatment was better in the group treated with a low opening pressure than in the group treated with a medium opening pressure, which contradicts the results in the study by Delwel et al, 5 where the clinical effect was the same in both groups (low/medium valve setting group and high valve setting group). The purpose of the latter study was to lower the valve setting until the optimal level was reached.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Boon and colleagues' study, 2 the clinical effect of shunt treatment was better in the group treated with a low opening pressure than in the group treated with a medium opening pressure, which contradicts the results in the study by Delwel et al, 5 where the clinical effect was the same in both groups (low/medium valve setting group and high valve setting group). The purpose of the latter study was to lower the valve setting until the optimal level was reached.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…This is not supported by our study, in which the patients in the 20-4 group that ended up at a low valve setting (4 cm H 2 O) presented with the same rate of SDH as the group with a medium valve setting (12 cm H 2 O). The discrepancy between the results could be interpreted to mean that gradual lowering of the opening pressure might have prevented the development of SDH, which thus might even support the recommendations presented in the iNPH guidelines.2 However, one should take into account that the 3 studies were conducted using different methodologies and 3 different valve types, which makes the conclusion speculative, but interesting.In Boon and colleagues' study, 2 the clinical effect of shunt treatment was better in the group treated with a low opening pressure than in the group treated with a medium opening pressure, which contradicts the results in the study by Delwel et al,5 where the clinical effect was the same in both groups (low/medium valve setting group and high valve setting group). The purpose of the latter study was to lower the valve setting until the optimal level was reached.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations