A Randomized Comparative Study of the Bandloop * Versus the Standard Loop for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Gotoh, Momokazu; Okamura, Kikuo; Hattori, Ryohei; Nakatani, Naoki; Kobayashi, Hiroaki; Tanaka, Kuniaki; Yamada, Shin; Kato, Takanori; Kinukawa, Tsuneo; Ono, Yoshinari; Ohshima, Shinichi

doi:10.1097/00005392-199911000-00019

Cited by 7 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In five studies 128,156,158,187,199 the average peak urine flow rate was higher in the TUVP group. A total of eight studies 55,57,138,156,158,193,199,200 presented data that were sufficiently similar to allow quantitative synthesis (Appendix 9.11, comparison 11:04:01). The WMD was 0.10 ml/s for TUVP versus TURP (95% CI -0.53 to 0.73, p = 0.76).…”

Section: At 3 Monthsmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…Seventeen RCTs reported in 27 papers 55,57,128,129,138,140,142,156,158,162,193,[196][197][198][199][200][201][262][263][264][265][266][267][268][269][270][271] randomised a total of 1449 participants. …”

Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A total of 12 studies 55,57,128,129,138,140,156,158,187,193,199,200 provided details of peak urine flow rate at 3 months after surgery. In five studies 128,156,158,187,199 the average peak urine flow rate was higher in the TUVP group.…”

Section: At 3 Monthsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Point estimates and measures of variability were presented in 88% of the studies, although in three studies it was unclear whether means or medians were used as the point estimate measure. 134,152,153 The dropout rate was unlikely to cause bias in 12 studies 124,138,150,[154][155][156][157][158][159][160][161][162] but this information was unclear in 74 (85%) of the studies. Only 16 studies (18%) stated that an intention to treat analysis was performed; however, this seems questionable in 11 of these studies 57,70,125,130,136,139,145,154,[163][164][165] as they failed to include the total number of participants in each arm in the subsequent follow-up assessments and an additional study stated that patients failing to complete the treatment or failing to return for follow-up were substituted.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…55,57,128,129,138,140,142,156,158,187,193,[197][198][199][200][201] Only peak urine flow rate is presented in this section. Results for the other urodynamic outcomes are presented in Appendix 8.11, Table 93 and Appendix 9.11, comparisons 11:04-11:09. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Systematic review and economic modelling of effectiveness and cost utility of surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement

Lourenço

Armstrong²,

N’Dow³

et al. 2008

Health Technol Assess

117

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Systematic review and economic modelling of effectiveness and cost utility of surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement. Lourenco, T.; Armstrong, N.; N'Dow, J.; Nabi, G.; Deverill, M.; Pickard, R.; Vale, L.; MacLennan, G.; Fraser, C.; McClinton, S.; Wong, S.; Coutts, A.; Mowatt, G.; Grant, A. Published in: Health Technology Assessment Publication date: 2008 Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA):Lourenco, T., Armstrong, N., N'Dow, J., Nabi, G., Deverill, M., Pickard, R., ... Grant, A. (2008). Systematic review and economic modelling of effectiveness and cost utility of surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement. Health Technology Assessment, 12(35). General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research.• You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain.• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 12. May. 2018 Health Technology Assessment 2008; Vol. 12: No. 35 Health Technology Assessment NIHR HTA Programme www.hta.ac.uk November 2008 Systematic review and economic modelling of effectiveness and cost utility of surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement How to obtain copies of this and other HTA Programme reports. An electronic version of this publication, in Adobe Acrobat format, is available for downloading free of charge for personal use from the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk). A fully searchable CD-ROM is also available (see below).Printed copies of HTA monographs cost £20 each (post and packing free in the UK) to both public and private sector purchasers from our Despatch Agents.Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per monograph and for the rest of the world £3 per monograph.You can order HTA monographs from our Despatch Agents:-fax (with credit card or official purchase order) -post (with credit card or official purchase order or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you either to pay securely by credit card or to print out your order and then post or fax it. NHS libraries can subscribe free of charge. Public libraries can subscribe at a very reduced cost of £100 for each volume (normally comprising 30-40 titles). The commercial subscription rate is £3...

show abstract

Section: At 3 Monthsmentioning

confidence: 91%

Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: At 3 Monthsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Systematic review and economic modelling of effectiveness and cost utility of surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement

Lourenço

Armstrong²,

N’Dow³

et al. 2008

Health Technol Assess

117

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Thick vs thin loop transurethral resection of the prostate: a double‐blind prospective trial of early morbidity

Holmes

Cox

Stewart³

et al. 2002

BJU International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ex‐vivo comparison of the haemostatic properties of standard transurethral resection and transurethral vaporization resection of the prostate

et al. 2003

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

TURP and TUVRP (using two different electrodes). Bleeding was quantified precisely in relation to tissue ablation for the two techniques, and specimens were evaluated histologically. RESULTSBoth TUVRP groups had significantly less bleeding ( P = 0.005) than the TURP group for a standardized ablation volume of perfused kidney tissue (18.9, 19.5 and 24.1 mL/min, respectively). The different TUVRP electrodes had no significant haemostatic differences.The histology showed significantly ( P = 0.03) larger coagulation zones for the TUVRP groups than for standard TURP. CONCLUSIONSTUVRP ex-vivo was associated with significantly better haemostasis than TURP. The haemostatic properties of different active electrodes for TUVRP seem to be equivalent. KEYWORDSTURP, transurethral vaporization resection of the prostate, BPH, ex vivo model, haemostasis

show abstract

A Randomized Comparative Study of the Bandloop * Versus the Standard Loop for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Cited by 7 publications

References 6 publications

Systematic review and economic modelling of effectiveness and cost utility of surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement

Systematic review and economic modelling of effectiveness and cost utility of surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement

Thick vs thin loop transurethral resection of the prostate: a double‐blind prospective trial of early morbidity

Ex‐vivo comparison of the haemostatic properties of standard transurethral resection and transurethral vaporization resection of the prostate

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About