2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.00984.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized controlled trial of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with lipiodol, doxorubicin and cisplatin versus intravenous doxorubicin for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major and often therapeutically frustrating oncological problem. A total of 100 patients with unresectable HCC were recruited and randomized to be treated with either transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or systemic chemotherapy. Fifty patients were treated with TACE using lipiodol, doxorubicin and cisplatin, while 50 patients were treated with systemic doxorubicin alone. Patients treated with TACE achieved a significantly higher response rate, with partial respon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(14,15) Hence, we were unable to update the results already presented concerning the survival benefit of TACE over no intervention. The other RCTs that were identified had different design and treatment arms and were focused on the comparison of different TACE techniques or protocols, (23)(24)(25)30) on the comparison of lipiodol TACE and either intravenous or transarterial chemotherapy (26,27) and on the use of lipiodol TACE alone versus lipiodol TACE combined with amiodarone or bevacizumab. (28,29) Median OS of HCC patients who received lipiodol TACE in this analysis-19.4 months-is consistent with the data reported in the previous metaanalyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(14,15) Hence, we were unable to update the results already presented concerning the survival benefit of TACE over no intervention. The other RCTs that were identified had different design and treatment arms and were focused on the comparison of different TACE techniques or protocols, (23)(24)(25)30) on the comparison of lipiodol TACE and either intravenous or transarterial chemotherapy (26,27) and on the use of lipiodol TACE alone versus lipiodol TACE combined with amiodarone or bevacizumab. (28,29) Median OS of HCC patients who received lipiodol TACE in this analysis-19.4 months-is consistent with the data reported in the previous metaanalyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15) Three of the twelve RCTs were focused on the comparison of different doses of lipiodol, (23) different classes of iodinated contrast materials, (24) or different types of embolic agents (25) for the execution of TACE procedures. Two other RCTs compared lipiodol TACE versus either intravenous doxorubicin (26) or transarterial chemotherapy with zinostatin stimalamer. (27) Two additional RCTs compared lipiodol TACE with or without the addition of systemically active drugs (i.e., amiodarone in one study (28) and bevacizumab in the other (29) ).…”
Section: Efficacy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doxorubicin has been chosen as the antineoplastic agent to be combined with the nanoparticles because it is the most active drug against HCC, producing tumor response rates of about 10–20% 28 , and is the most common drug used in chemoembolization. 29 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When surgery options are precluded, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is one of the options that can be used to treat locally advanced tumours in the liver. In this procedure, an intra-arterial injection of anticancer drugs (usually doxorubicin and/or cisplatin) is administrated immediately prior to embolization [6, 7]. Doxorubicin and cisplatin are commonly used as anticancer drugs, but their clinical efficacy is frequently limited by the development of drug resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%