A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Emergency Department–Based Interactive Computer Program to Prevent Alcohol Misuse Among Injured Adolescents

Maio, Ronald F.; Shope, Jean T.; Blow, Frederic C.; Gregor, Mary Ann; Zakrajsek, Jennifer S.; Weber, James E.; Nypaver, Michele M.

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.10.013

Cited by 103 publications

(104 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

103

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Jackson et al's review 37 of ASBI for young people in health settings identified eight controlled trials 53,[80][81][82][83][84][85] for young people. The work was part of a larger review of ASBI in adults and young people.…”

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The work was part of a larger review of ASBI in adults and young people. The trials were published between 1999 and 2009 and the majority (seven) [80][81][82][83][84][85][86] were carried out in the USA. Study population sizes ranged from 34 to 655 young people and included young people aged between 12 and 24 years with two of the included studies being for those aged ≥ 18 years only.…”

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Five of the trials tested a brief MI, which lasted between 20-45 minutes, 81,[83][84][85][86] whereas one tested an audio programme; 80 another involved a more intense programme of MI which included four sessions 53 and one comprised an interactive laptop computer-based intervention. 82 The length of follow-up varied between 2 and 12 months. Four of the studies 53,[83][84][85] found statistically significant benefits as a result of the intervention.…”

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…80 Wachtel and Staniford 77 also reviewed the literature in relation to alcohol misuse and binge drinking in adolescents in the clinical setting (hospital-based emergency departments, college health centres and adolescent healthcare clinics). 77 The review included 14 studies, 53,80,[82][83][84][85][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94] 12 of which were from the USA. 53,80,[82][83][84][85][87][88][89][90][91]93 Nine of the included studies 83,84,[87][88][89][90][91][92][93] related to young people aged ≥ 18 years and included a heterogeneous range of interventions from very brief MI to four group sessions of 30-40 minutes, which meant that generalisability BACKGROUND TO THE RESEARCH NIHR Journals Library www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk could not be ascertained.…”

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A review of the literature by Yuma-Guerrero et al 78 around BI in emergency departments in the USA for young people identified seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs). [82][83][84][85][95][96][97] The primary studies included young people aged 12-20 years. Four [82][83][84]98 of the included studies demonstrated a significant intervention effect; however, none reduced both alcohol consumption and alcohol-related consequences.…”

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH)

Newbury‐Birch

Scott

O’Donnell

et al. 2014

Public Health Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14-15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH) This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full PHR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/phr. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Public Health Research journalReports are published in Public Health Research (PHR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the PHR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors.Reviews in Public Health Research are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. PHR programmeThe Public Health Research (PHR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), evaluates public health interventions, providing new knowledge on the benefits, costs, acceptability and wider impacts of non-NHS interventions intended to improve the health of the public and reduce inequalities in health. The scope of the programme is multi-disciplinary and broad, covering a range of interventions that improve public health. The Public Health Research programme also complements the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme which has a growing portfolio evaluating NHS public health interventions.For more information about the PHR programme please visit the website: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/phr This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the PHR programme as project number 10/3002/07. The contractual start date was in October 2011. The final report began editorial review in September 2013 and was accepted for publication in June 2014. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The PHR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the PHR programme or the Department of Health. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors,...

show abstract

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH)

Newbury‐Birch

Scott

O’Donnell

et al. 2014

Public Health Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effects of a Brief Intervention for Reducing Violence and Alcohol Misuse Among Adolescents

Walton¹,

Chermack²,

Shope³

et al. 2010

JAMA

Self Cite

356

300

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community-dwelling populations

Kaner

Beyer

Garnett

et al. 2017

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

229

250

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is moderate-quality evidence that digital interventions may lower alcohol consumption, with an average reduction of up to three (UK) standard drinks per week compared to control participants. Substantial heterogeneity and risk of performance and publication bias may mean the reduction was lower. Low-quality evidence from fewer studies suggested there may be little or no difference in impact on alcohol consumption between digital and face-to-face interventions.The BCTs of behaviour substitution, problem solving and credible source were associated with the effectiveness of digital interventions to reduce alcohol consumption and warrant further investigation in an experimental context.Reporting of theory use was very limited and often unclear when present. Over half of the interventions made no reference to any theories. Limited reporting of theory use was unrelated to heterogeneity in intervention effectiveness.

show abstract

A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Emergency Department–Based Interactive Computer Program to Prevent Alcohol Misuse Among Injured Adolescents

Cited by 103 publications

References 35 publications

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH)

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH)

Effects of a Brief Intervention for Reducing Violence and Alcohol Misuse Among Adolescents

Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community-dwelling populations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About