1994
DOI: 10.1016/0195-6701(94)90056-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized prospective study of cefoxitin versus piperacillin in appendicectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A single-dose cefotetan was equally effective as multiple-dose cefoxitin according to the study by Liberman et al (14). (11)(12)(13)(14) and duration of IV antibiotics in cases of non-perforated appendicitis (14,15). there were no rcts found comparing different regimens of antibiotic prophylaxis specifically regarding perforated appendicitis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A single-dose cefotetan was equally effective as multiple-dose cefoxitin according to the study by Liberman et al (14). (11)(12)(13)(14) and duration of IV antibiotics in cases of non-perforated appendicitis (14,15). there were no rcts found comparing different regimens of antibiotic prophylaxis specifically regarding perforated appendicitis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumarakrishnan et al (12) showed that the combination of cefotaxime-metronidazole had the lowest wound infection rate compared to metronidazolegentamycin and metronidazole-ciprofloxacin. Salam et al (13) showed that prophylactic cefoxitin or piperacillin were similarly effective in minimizing the rate of wound infections. A single-dose cefotetan was equally effective as multiple-dose cefoxitin according to the study by Liberman et al (14).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, a second-generation cephalosporin with anaerobic activity (cefoxitin or cefotetan) or third-generation cephalosporins with partial anaerobic activity (cefotaxime) were effective, with postoperative SSI rates of <5% in most studies. 364,[375][376][377][378][379][380][381] Piperacillin 2 g was comparable to cefoxitin 2 g in a well-controlled study. 381 Metronidazole used alone was less effective than cefotaxime, with infection rates above 10%.…”
Section: Appendectomy Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the data on conventional appendectomies published between 1992 and 1998 permits us to make the following statements [12, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27]: (1) Antibiotic prophylaxis is essential. (2) The infection rates for children are lower than for adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%