2022
DOI: 10.3233/faia220145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Ranking Semantics for Abstract Argumentation Based on Serialisability

Abstract: We revisit the foundations of ranking semantics for abstract argumentation frameworks by observing that most existing approaches are incompatible with classical extension-based semantics. In particular, most ranking semantics violate the principle of admissibility, meaning that admissible arguments are not necessarily better ranked than inadmissible arguments. We propose new postulates for capturing said compatibility with classical extension-based semantics and present a new ranking semantics that complies wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
references
References 14 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance